Bible badgers team

[dubizzy]

Goddard, grimes, heppell, Hanley, hartlett, Gibbs- terlich, Stevenson ,

Beams, pendalbury, redden, crouch, omeara, t.Mitchell , k.mitchell, towers â€" viney , hvorat

Goldstein, leunberger- currie, Osborn

Franklin, Rockliff , wright, Martin , broughton, Sylvia â€" lee , neade

2100$ left.

Smashed the backline and forward line because I hated all the rookies . Give us ya thoughts

[dubizzy]

Carn homeboys

[dubizzy]

Someone must have some thoughts surely

[Sweetness]

Mate, if all your mid rookies come off you will probably win the $50k. That's a big IF though..
That being said you Gotta risk it for the biscuit

[Capper]

you have spent too much on your backs and will be too far behind the ball with only 3 prem mids

[Dutchie64]

you have spent too much on your backs and will be too far behind the ball with only 3 prem mids

+1

[yorgis]

you will have trouble trying to get 8 of your mids playing avey week until they fatten, then it will be too late,

you'll be playing catch up for the rest of the season. def and for line too strong mids very weak

[Jukes]

grrr player names without capital letters grrrr

I'd think about "downgrading" Broughton to Cloke (gain like 30k and Cloke will avg almost 10 more) then switching Hrovat and Viney to O'Meara and Crouch.

[betch ya]

Need a swan or ablett with that team structure i rekkn

[maddog]

Is that the name of your team, or are you religious? Not that it matters, just makes curiose people look i suppose. But as most advise is saying, you will more than likely end up as a reasonally strong team, but more than likely fall way to far back early if going for overall

[dubizzy]

Goddard, Grimes, Gibbs, Hartlett , Heppell, Hanley - Pittard, Terlich

Beams, Pendalbury, Gaff, Mitchell, Crouch, Omeara, Mitchell, Goodes- Hrovat , Viney

Goldstein, Leunburger - Currie, Witts

Franklin , Rockliff, Wright , Martin , Sylvia, Broughton - Macaffer , Lee

300$

Something different, help us out with your thoughts