Dangerfield VS Murphy

Started by The_Captain, December 07, 2012, 08:36:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Who do you reckon will average more this season?

Patrick Dangerfield
Marc Murphy

The_Captain


nrich102


Adamant

Definitely Murphy.

Danger is an absolute jet, but Murphy is proven and underpriced ;)

Football Factory

Murphy aslong as his shoulder is ok

The_Captain

Cheers for your thoughts guys. Just hearing a lot of people say Murphy can't handle the tag.. Pretty sure Judd gets the best tagger anyway ?

Windigo

Quote from: noto07 on December 08, 2012, 12:52:37 AM
Cheers for your thoughts guys. Just hearing a lot of people say Murphy can't handle the tag.. Pretty sure Judd gets the best tagger anyway ?

They started tagging him in some games last year though.

elephants

Yeah, Marc started to get some work done on him last season.

Seeing as he is their best player these days I feel the Blues coaching staff will devise ways to protect him next season :)

Danger would be much more unique and far from a bad pick though imo :)

Shihan7


Ziplock

Murphy- what's the saying, better a bird in the hand than 2 in the bush?

Murphy is more proven- you know he can average 110, and even with horror year and injuries he still averaged 100+.

Danger's had one good year.

Seriously consider not fielding him against the saints though- he just performs terribly against them.

The_Captain

Cherers for the thoughts guys. WIll be looking at both options come nab cup

tbagrocks

the Dangerman's only had the one year in the guts and he nearly stole a Brownlow ;) The most explosive player in the comp and sure to be a leading ball winner next season

Still this could be close, those saying easily Murph will be eating their words :P

quinny88


Tyes

Murph, simply because he is underpriced.