Zorko good enough for M6?:

[Hagebear]

I wuld probably say no. Hes been scoring awesome and doesnt look like slowing down but i would still prefer a super-premo mid over Zorko.

[powersuperkents]

Just sub zorko into your forward line so he is your f7, and sub beams/sidey into the mids so they are ur m6. Same thing just looks better

Thats pointless. If a dpp plays forward and midfield, you select him for your forward line... It looks bad to even have sidey or beams in your midfield because it'll look like you have a forward there anyway... It like having Deledio or Goddard in your midfield... It just doesn't look good :/

I disagree. Beams is ranked 7th in terms of midfield averages and Sidebottom is 11th (Thomspson is 8th and Mitchell is 12th)
Lids is 6th by the way.

Although I understand having that player in your mids means you have someone who averages less in the fwd line than Beams/Sidebum, it's been handy to have that link available to cover Martin with Beams and i don't really care how it looks. I care how many points I can get!  ;D

It doesn't make a difference in points all there doing is subbing Zorko from M6 to F7 and Beams/Sidey from F7 to M6 it doesn't make a difference, its an inconvenience of time and stupid to even talk about something so stupid and the person who brought up the point was joking I think :) I just always have a DPP player in the most insignificant position available for  him unless their a For/Back which means I don't care.. This because if its a midfield/back or a midfield/forward I put them in forward or back never midfield (unless a rookie for bench cover) because then your wasting potential for a higher scoring premium players place in your midfield. If their a forward/ruck you put them in your forward line which then opens up space for the highest scoring rucks. With the highest scoring rucks im not one to talk though because I'm still fielding Giles :( I would do anything to convert him to Maric...

The point is the guy who made the topic... It may take a few trade which you don't have so in your case Zorko is good enough for M6 I didn't get Zorko and I'd do anything to trade that... Don't trade out Zorko if anything try sub him into the forward line and make a few downgrades upgrade some rookie to a M6... An M6 only really needs to average 90...

My Past M6's (I made league GF and SF all of these years as well)
2009 - Liam Anthony Avg: 96.2 (only a rookie that year but a gun/ Made Grand Final and Lost)(Finished First on Ladder) 
2010 - Adam Selwood Avg: 92 (also had Shane Tuck as M5 Avg: 96.2/ Made Semi Final and Lost)(Finished First on Ladder)
2011 - Leigh Montagna Avg: 98 (I had a great midfield that year / Made Semi Final and Lost only Fluke though (byes didn't agree with my team that year)(Finished Fourth on Ladder but top 4 was real close)
2012 - Scott Selwood Avg: 97.5 (Currently Second on the ladder 1 win behind top team lost because of byes)(hope I can finally bag the grand final)
Every single Season I was the highest scoring team in my league... and not one of my M6's averaged 100 its, they did when I got them then dropped in form.
If you have Zorko as M6 and he's averaging 100 your going to be fine, the idea is to have every player in your midfield averaging over 100 and so far your achieving it so NO PROBLEM!!! :D and even if his form drops you could straight swap him to a premo unlike my situation with Scooter Selwood :/

[Fireballz]

Just sub zorko into your forward line so he is your f7, and sub beams/sidey into the mids so they are ur m6. Same thing just looks better

Thats pointless. If a dpp plays forward and midfield, you select him for your forward line... It looks bad to even have sidey or beams in your midfield because it'll look like you have a forward there anyway... It like having Deledio or Goddard in your midfield... It just doesn't look good :/

I disagree. Beams is ranked 7th in terms of midfield averages and Sidebottom is 11th (Thomspson is 8th and Mitchell is 12th)
Lids is 6th by the way.

Although I understand having that player in your mids means you have someone who averages less in the fwd line than Beams/Sidebum, it's been handy to have that link available to cover Martin with Beams and i don't really care how it looks. I care how many points I can get!  ;D

It doesn't make a difference in points all there doing is subbing Zorko from M6 to F7 and Beams/Sidey from F7 to M6 it doesn't make a difference, its an inconvenience of time and stupid to even talk about something so stupid and the person who brought up the point was joking I think :) I just always have a DPP player in the most insignificant position available for  him unless their a For/Back which means I don't care.. This because if its a midfield/back or a midfield/forward I put them in forward or back never midfield (unless a rookie for bench cover) because then your wasting potential for a higher scoring premium players place in your midfield. If their a forward/ruck you put them in your forward line which then opens up space for the highest scoring rucks. With the highest scoring rucks im not one to talk though because I'm still fielding Giles :( I would do anything to convert him to Maric...

Yeah what I meant was that if they are scoring well it doesn't matter what it looks like having a fwd in the mids. But you're right and you have given me an idea to upgrade Gibson in my mids to give me 6 specialist premium mids and 8 premium fwds and use Couch as my mid/fwd link  8)

[powersuperkents]

Just sub zorko into your forward line so he is your f7, and sub beams/sidey into the mids so they are ur m6. Same thing just looks better

Thats pointless. If a dpp plays forward and midfield, you select him for your forward line... It looks bad to even have sidey or beams in your midfield because it'll look like you have a forward there anyway... It like having Deledio or Goddard in your midfield... It just doesn't look good :/

I disagree. Beams is ranked 7th in terms of midfield averages and Sidebottom is 11th (Thomspson is 8th and Mitchell is 12th)
Lids is 6th by the way.

Although I understand having that player in your mids means you have someone who averages less in the fwd line than Beams/Sidebum, it's been handy to have that link available to cover Martin with Beams and i don't really care how it looks. I care how many points I can get!  ;D

It doesn't make a difference in points all there doing is subbing Zorko from M6 to F7 and Beams/Sidey from F7 to M6 it doesn't make a difference, its an inconvenience of time and stupid to even talk about something so stupid and the person who brought up the point was joking I think :) I just always have a DPP player in the most insignificant position available for  him unless their a For/Back which means I don't care.. This because if its a midfield/back or a midfield/forward I put them in forward or back never midfield (unless a rookie for bench cover) because then your wasting potential for a higher scoring premium players place in your midfield. If their a forward/ruck you put them in your forward line which then opens up space for the highest scoring rucks. With the highest scoring rucks im not one to talk though because I'm still fielding Giles :( I would do anything to convert him to Maric...

Yeah what I meant was that if they are scoring well it doesn't matter what it looks like having a fwd in the mids. But you're right and you have given me an idea to upgrade Gibson in my mids to give me 6 specialist premium mids and 8 premium fwds and use Couch as my mid/fwd link  8)

Haha I need to really strengthen my midfield, I chose Rockliff out of loyalty this year and he is nothing compared to what he was for me last season... Scott Selwood was my worst midfield pick up... I'm proud of my forward line though I have Hawkins in F7 and he has the potential to rack up a +100 every now and then and next week I bring in Heath Scotland into my backs for either Lee Spurr or Sam Shaw and that will make Broughton B7 :( but that makes Birchall B6 :) then with the last of my money with my then completed team I can upgrade Giles and hopefully win my first league grand final :D