If money were no object

Started by thewizz, July 06, 2012, 01:04:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

As it says, who would better?

Enright
5 (35.7%)
Carrazzo
7 (50%)
Someone else (but who?)
2 (14.3%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

thewizz

July 06, 2012, 01:04:48 PM
Who shold I choose?

glam77

#1
July 06, 2012, 01:08:09 PM
Assuming referrring to this backline....
"Backline of Deliedio, Adcock, Lake, Dempsey, Ellis, Shaw, Bugg (Goddard, Clarke)"


Waters?

thewizz

#2
July 06, 2012, 01:12:51 PM
Cant afford. Broke  :'( :'( :'(

glam77

#3
July 06, 2012, 01:15:30 PM
Quote from: thewizz on July 06, 2012, 01:12:51 PM
Cant afford. Broke  :'( :'( :'(

...so money is an object then?!?!?!
So why the thread title?  ;D

quinny88

#4
July 06, 2012, 01:15:57 PM
Quote from: thewizz on July 06, 2012, 01:12:51 PM
Cant afford. Broke  :'( :'( :'(

So money is an object? lol  ::)

I think carrazzo or birchall are your best options imo

charliesheen

#5
July 06, 2012, 01:23:14 PM
Carrots from that list. 

roo boys!

#6
July 06, 2012, 01:29:08 PM
Carrazzo over Enright, Birchall over Carrazzo. So if I had to pick one you put in the poll, Carrazzo. If I could pick anyone around that price, Birchall.

charliesheen

#7
July 06, 2012, 01:38:27 PM
I would still pick Carrots over Birchall.

Think he is going to be more influential on the results of the game especially if Carlton are to make the 8.

enzedder

#8
July 06, 2012, 03:43:54 PM
Carrazzo's average excluding his 3pt? game is 112. Nuff said.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions