Final Mid: Swan or Watson

Started by SkyStud24, June 22, 2012, 09:21:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

SkyStud24


treebeard

If you want the best you can't go past Swan.
But dreamteam is a game of compromises so would also depend on cash/trades etc.

owenbond007

If you got ablett then you probably dont need swan as you will have a equally just as good arguably better captain option. Then its all about points per dollar (taking price over average). Swan is $4646, whereas Watson is $4472. Swan has a lot better history of durability but has had a recent soft tissue injury. So durability wise i dont think there is a lot of difference between em. So Watson is better value for money so get him if money in the bank is a issue, if its not or you dont have ablett go Swan.

myalup mullets

Quote from: owenbond007 on June 22, 2012, 10:15:18 AM
If you got ablett then you probably dont need swan as you will have a equally just as good arguably better captain option. Then its all about points per dollar (taking price over average). Swan is $4646, whereas Watson is $4472. Swan has a lot better history of durability but has had a recent soft tissue injury. So durability wise i dont think there is a lot of difference between em. So Watson is better value for money so get him if money in the bank is a issue, if its not or you dont have ablett go Swan.

nice work there!

Bak2Form

Swan! purely becuase he can win you games almost on his own! he pumps out scores of 140+ and can do it often. I loved having swan captain when he scored the 171 on anzac day. i think swan over watson only for that reason and that his held an average over 120 for 4 years now. Watson has yet to finish a season with an average of 100.

Ricochet