Andrew Moore

Started by henry, June 11, 2012, 12:40:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

henry

Worth a look? Was a high draft pick (around 8-15 if memory is correct) in 2009 and has struggled with injury, playing 7 games in 2010 and 6 last year. Priced as an expensive rook at 153.3k and is listed as a back. Could be an alternative downgrade option to shaw but on the downside he hasn;t had his bye yet. FF lists his BE at 14, not sure how accurate that is but he may still be an ok pickup after round 13 when he's had his first price rise which wouldn't be that much. Not sure on his JS, but I'd think it;d be relatively good in a struggling port side. Scored 6 in his first game but that was as a sub, scored 82 yesterday in his first full game. If he has another strong game I'll consider downgrading Conca for him. Thoughts?

Thunderstruck

Primus intends to play him but an article online today says its likely in the midfield and not as a backman even though his kicking off the half back flank is fine.

Time will tell though if he cements his place or not.

Windigo

He is in the coming years. Lots of potential.  :)

henry

Quote from: Windigo on June 11, 2012, 12:50:13 PM
He is in the coming years. Lots of potential.  :)
Yeah even if he doesn't play much this year looming as a nice smokie next year  :)

JBs-Hawks

Was he number 20 cos I was at the game and he looked good overhead.

Andrew

Would have to be after the round 13 bye - bit of a tricky one.

Justin Bieber

I like the look of backman.

I need a downgrade for either Morris or Ellis for round 13.

PowerBug

Quote from: JBs-Hawks on June 11, 2012, 01:03:08 PM
Was he number 20 cos I was at the game and he looked good overhead.
20 is Wingard, and he was AWESOME overhead.

Moore is the blonde flowerball no. 26. Sorry but i don't rate him at all, would much rather Rodan or even Jason Davenport who we delisted at the end of last year.

Hopefully he proves me wrong.

Windigo

He pick number 9.

Out of the top 10 last year. He has played the second least games.