Is Luke Parker good enough to be 6th Mid?

[Colty]

My team is

Delidio, Goddard, Duffield, Lake, Bugg, Malceski, Ellis - Townsend, Paine

Pendels, GAJ, Selwood, JPK, Parker, Magner -----Coniglio, Sheil

Natinui, Giles - Redden, Stephenson

Goodes, Dangerfield, Cloke, Buddy, NRoo, Kennedy (GWS), Milera --- D Smith, J Cameron.


Parker has pumped out scores of 56 (injured at half time), 62, 108 and 128. (first two scores not exact)
I think he has now established himself in the guts for the Swans and I feel like he will average around mid 90's, does this justify keeping him for the season or should I look to trade him  when he peaks which will be around $480k if he averages around 90.

Cheers   

[charliesheen]

No, it simply won't cut it, will need to upgrade him @ some stage.  Will be very handy with GAJ out.  Just get McDonald into your team :)

[Capper]

im in the same boat but i am looking at keeping parker as M7 on the bench so if a player has a rest or injured during the last weeks of the season he comes in

[Colty]

I think he is going to be worth to much money simply for bench cover, I wouldnt be comfortable having $450k sitting on my bench.

[charliesheen]

I think he is going to be worth to much money simply for bench cover, I wouldnt be comfortable having $450k sitting on my bench.

+1.  At best, keep him during byes.