Mummy to Sandilands

[Maca24]

Your an idiot.

I always find this statement to be ironic. It should be "you're", not "your".

And I always find people who correct others to be "White Goodmans".

White Goodmans who can spell

I bet I can spell much better than you mate!

Nobody should be trading Mummy just yet. Think he will be fine, no need to panic  ;)

haha not sure what that makes me,, i snapped traded him to sandi once i saw he didnt play

That is pretty sideways, but has payed off for you so far. I just don't find it to be a necessary trade but I have been wrong before.

[upthemaidens]

Your an idiot.

I always find this statement to be ironic. It should be "you're", not "your".

And I always find people who correct others to be "White Goodmans".

White Goodmans who can spell

I bet I can spell much better than you mate!

Nobody should be trading Mummy just yet. Think he will be fine, no need to panic  ;)

haha not sure what that makes me,, i snapped traded him to sandi once i saw he didnt play

That is pretty sideways, but has payed off for you so far. I just don't find it to be a necessary trade but I have been wrong before.

it paid off until sandi gets turf toe next week.....

[Bosh]

Your an idiot.

I always find this statement to be ironic. It should be "you're", not "your".

And I always find people who correct others to be "White Goodmans".

White Goodmans who can spell

I bet I can spell much better than you mate!

Nobody should be trading Mummy just yet. Think he will be fine, no need to panic  ;)

haha not sure what that makes me,, i snapped traded him to sandi once i saw he didnt play

That is pretty sideways, but has payed off for you so far. I just don't find it to be a necessary trade but I have been wrong before.

**Paid**  ;)

[MC]

Lol. This thread has had more of a grammatical focus than anything remotely SC-related!

[Bosh]

Lol. This thread has had more of a grammatical focus than anything remotely SC-related!

:) Thought my correction was fitting as he has just said he was a better speller than someone on his previous post.

Anyway, no to trading Mummy to Sandilands, no point making a decision until you know the extent of Mummy's injury.

[MC]

:) Thought my correction was fitting as he has just said he was a better speller than someone on his previous post.

Hence the lol and +1 ;)

[brownmans muffins]

This isn't the worst idea for a corrective trade.

Meanwhile....

SOMEONE GET BILLY ZANE....IT'S A SPELL-OFF!!!!

[SydneyRox]

Yup - back on topic, and not 5year old spelling b's

Stupid idea! Mummy is a premium ruck and so we all got a donut this week. Giles was more than decent cover.

[mpollock]

"Giles was more than decent cover" - remember that most people who have Mumford have Giles as their 2nd ruckman ... this means the cover was Redden who scored 60.

In my case ... I missed the lockout so copped a zero.

If you are going for overall and Mumford is out for another week or 2 then a trade may be required.
If you are going for league then just used Redden as cover.

Some decent options to swap mummy for ... Kruizer with scores of 125 & 100 and pocket the change.
Ryder also has two good scores and pocket the money.
Sandilands is killing it at the moment as well.

[THardy93]

I'm open to that idea. Yeah, trading hard at the start can seem stupid..

but you'll catch Sandi before his price rises to its 2009/10 prices.

So if you're going to do a sideways trade, the only justifiable time is now for fix ups.

However, getting the right rookies takes place for those trades imo.