which is a better option??

Started by connollc, March 21, 2012, 01:04:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

connollc

Rem. Salary Cap
$6,900

Defenders
Goddard, Deledio, Shaw, Fisher, Lake,  Ellis,  Bugg, < Darley, Morris, S >

Mids
Ablett, Dal Santo Priddis, Dangerfield, Clifton, S Ledger, T   < Shiel, D Magner, J >

Rucks
Leuenberger,  Giles, < Redden, J  Stephenson, O >

Forwards
Franklin, Goodes, . Fyfe, Martin,  Riewoldt, N  Smith, D  Hampton, C -  <Pfeiffer, D  Kerridge, S >


Could probably drop Fisher and Shaw and save $50,000 but dont think i need the cash.
Ruck, going with the 1 and 3. Lions first 9 games are going to rack Leu up massive points.
I suppose the fwds and Mids are looking alright.

Keep changing my mind,Ahhhhhhhhhh Comments please

Thanks

Babylove

Backs: your backs look okay. Don't know that you could have Deledio, Ellis & Morris in the one team.  Maybe one too many tigers in the line.  Other than that, looks fine.

Mids: premiums look fine. I prefer Dangerfield in the forward line but could be useful for dpp. Obviously Magner will need to be elevated so check on that.

Rucks: For the strategy you've chosen I prefer one of the top ricks, Cox if you can afford him because they can get the really big scores which helps when your second ruck is a rookie.

Forwards: Forwards look fine.

dmac07

Agree with most of what has been said. If you drop Shaw to broughton could you afford Dal Santo to pendlebury? Though dal santo is a bit more unique

connollc

Thanks for the comments guys,
my feeling on having three tigers is that one or maybe two will be repleaced before round 13.

I had danger or martin for mid just to open up the dpp. Magner is up but may be replaced by cunningham or similar.

For Rucks, Cox too exp at the min maybe can get cash for Mumford

Not sure on N. Roo. he doesnt look convincing

connollc

which is a better combo

N Roo as a 5th fwd and Giles as a Second ruck man

or

Kreuzer as a 2nd ruck man and Coniglio as a 4th mid

??

Dangerman is the DPP

connollc