Chad Wingard

Started by underdog11, March 08, 2012, 12:17:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Will you have him

Yes, going to dominate ports midfield, lock and load!
8 (26.7%)
Undecided, Looks good, but a hefty price
14 (46.7%)
No, you can get the same 60k cheaper
8 (26.7%)

Total Members Voted: 1

underdog11

His a star, but has a hefty price tag. Fits in to my plan perfectly so I'd say his a lock for mine atm. What about yours?

Cayenne

I think his real up side is his bye week. There's cheaper options sure, but how many are there with a round 13 bye?

Jukes

I'm going with 5 mid super-premiums over 500k so I won't be going with a high-picked rookie for my 6th mid. Wingard looks promising but won't be finding his way into my team unless Virtual Sports gives me an extra 60k.

Mr.Craig

If he had a better team around him then I'd be a little more enthusiastic. Should do alright though.

Windigo

I'm currently rolling with Hogan at 5 & Clifton at 6. If I free up some cash by going with Red-Rock I'll consider getting him again.

But Clifo should score the same?  ???

tigers123

yeah he looks promising, but would coniglio be a better option for 10K more? apparently wingard lacks some match fitness...

mezzoculo

Quote from: Windigo on March 08, 2012, 05:05:18 PM
I'm currently rolling with Hogan at 5 & Clifton at 6. If I free up some cash by going with Red-Rock I'll consider getting him again.

But Clifo should score the same?  ???
You'd reckon that Stevie C has better scoring potential, if not job security. A man amongst boys who (unlike Chad) is unlikely to be rested or subbed without warning.

mdub

He'll probley be subbed quite a lot

Ziplock

... at port?

lets face it, he was taken at pick 6 this year

that puts him easily in the top 4 players at port, even considering his current age and development.

mezzoculo

Quote from: Ziplock on March 08, 2012, 06:58:48 PM
... at port?
lets face it, he was taken at pick 6 this year
that puts him easily in the top 4 players at port, even considering his current age and development.

I agree with what this guys said:
Quote from: Ziplock on March 01, 2012, 10:26:13 PM
Quote from: whatlez on March 01, 2012, 10:22:18 PM
Chad Wingard. Best rookie to pick this year?
He could be, certainly shown to be a gun scorer etc. But primus apparently doesn't think he's quite there for afl level (too light I'm guessing), so he mighten't be getting consistent time in a DT friendly position, maybe not even consistent games at afl level.

Justin Bieber



I agree with what this guys said:
Quote from: Ziplock on March 01, 2012, 10:26:13 PM
Quote from: whatlez on March 01, 2012, 10:22:18 PM
Chad Wingard. Best rookie to pick this year?
He could be, certainly shown to be a gun scorer etc. But primus apparently doesn't think he's quite there for afl level (too light I'm guessing), so he mighten't be getting consistent time in a DT friendly position, maybe not even consistent games at afl level.
[/quote]

Me or zip? And my opinion has changed since then

mezzoculo

Zip makes some good points in response to your question, whatlez.

Justin Bieber

But what I said was ages ago, I change what I say now haha