Kruezer and Macintosh COMBO??

Started by The Supercoach, March 06, 2012, 12:00:52 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

H mac and Kruezer COMBO

Risk It
Not worth it
Ur crazy for thinking it
Just go with 1
Both to risky

The Supercoach

Just wondering what people think of the Kruezer H mac combo. I havent seen any teams with both of them and i think it could potentially make or break a team. Is it to risky, is it safer to get 1 premium and 1 of these guys. Or is it a risk seriously worth considering.

4INAROW

is a bit risky, personally im really considering a cox/kreuzer combo, but it's really upto the individual.

it could pay off for you, if your taking a risk in the rucks, try not to on another line imo.

if 1 player doesnt work out it's an easy fix, although you burn a trade.

if 6-7 players turn to shower your flowered.

bottlemart

I initially had Kreuz hmac combo, but I'm now looking at cox and hmac, but i could easily go cox and kreuz.  I'm not concerned about the WC North bye, cos it's one round in a 24 round season. 

Cox, well enough said, the bloke has been a gun for about 10 years, (with the exception of late 2009 and early 2010 when he had the dodgy groin). 

hmac or kruez are cheap and one may be worth the risk and if they don't work out, then they still should make some cash and yes, like 4inarow says, you can gamble on one ruck but not 2.  Play one premium and the other can be upgraded to another premium at a later date if need be. 

pavs nose

do it and if it goes pear shaped downgrade to orren/redden/giles. whichever you dont have

ronl

I have both locked in.  Kruezer is finally ready after 3 years to take the big step.  His NAB cup form has been good, all the signs are finally there. Hmac has proven he can dominate and looks a perfect fit for the Kangaroos this year.  I firmly believe both of these guys will average in the 90's.
The rest of my team is solid and well structured on all lines so, injuries and bad luck aside, I'm quietly confident of having a good year.

tor01doc

If both HMc and Kreuz average an optimistic 90 then you'll be about 35 points per week behind Mummy / Leue combo (assuming they stay the same as last year).

The saving of $381900 would allow an upgrade of a $106600 rookie to a premium valued at $488500.

Good rookie makes about 70 per week - $488500 player scores 90 points.

Not worth it unless both really fire.

No thanks.

I want my Mummy.


ronl

I see your point, but you must remember that the money I saved in selecting Kruezer and Mac allowed me to have a fifth prem in my midfield who would probably average 110ppg which is 40 points more than an average rookie midfielder.  Meanwhile, Kruezer and Mac are hopefully appreciating, rather than dropping, in value.

tor01doc

This reminds me of swings and roundabouts.

I guess my main concern is lack of faith in both of the 2 rucks doing a lot better than previously.

I have a gut feeling trades will be spared by getting a set and forget pair.

We will see huh.

Good luck.

I do agree though that with these 2 in the ruck the rest of the team can be made to look pretty good.

ronl


C.Judd3Votes