Martin/ Shaw or Fyfe/ Birchall

cortez · February 14, 2012, 01:18:49 PM

which combo is best?

tor01doc · February 14, 2012, 01:39:28 PM

51/49 - gutless reply I know.

I would lean to Martin Shaw as for some reason I think Fyfe is weedier / Barlow's back and Martin seems more robust.

What about Suckling instead of Virtual? Frees up $17600 which could help open a few options.

cortez · February 14, 2012, 01:58:54 PM

It is for my third back and i would rather birchall than suckling i think.

tor01doc · February 14, 2012, 02:04:22 PM

Does Hawthorn's draw concern you re picking Birchall early?

Pies / Gee / Ade / WCE (A) / Sydney / St K / Melb / Freo.

Could be 2/3 & 6/5 after 8 rounds.

cortez · February 14, 2012, 02:07:50 PM

na cause at worst i can see them at 5-3 or 6-2.

tor01doc · February 14, 2012, 02:09:27 PM

Hope you're right.

dmac07 · February 14, 2012, 02:27:30 PM

Tough call, would go Martin and Shaw just.

Martin 108 + Shaw 102 = 210 a week

Fyfe 110 + Birchill 98 = 208 a week

Also with Barlow back, and Fyfes shoulder, martin shaw just seems a little safer for ismilar reward.

fever · February 14, 2012, 04:15:09 PM

martin shaw

Ziplock · February 14, 2012, 06:16:12 PM

I'd be leaning towards martin and shaw. Martin's skill is undeniable, and shaw's a proven scorer. In contrast, fyfe has had an interrupted pre-season, and Birchall only broke out due to a changed game plan.