Jobe Watson vs Michael Barlow

[Jalapeno]

Who is a better option? What do you think there averages will be this year???

Regards Jalapeno ;D

[fivestarmd]

Barlow all the way. Watson too injury prone. Good when he's going but won't give you 22 games

[upthemaidens]

probably pretty similar averages, 5 points either way..  barlow is better value though

[owenbond007]

Dont think his that injury proned numbers from preious seasons:

2006 21 games
2007 19 games
2008 19 games
2009 21 games
2010 21 games
2011 16 games

[Purple 77]

Watson isn't injury prone, and will score more than Barlow IMO this year.

But... Barlow's cheaper :)

[Windigo]

Pretty tough choice. Cannot split them. Barlow we know can score heavily and Jobe hovers around the 100.

Hm.

[Tom_16]

Watson isn't injury prone, and will score more than Barlow IMO this year.

But... Barlow's cheaper :)

+1 Both players are out and out guns but Barlow is too cheap to ignore.

[StuL]

I'm with BT. BARLOW!

[SydneyRox]

In my opinion it comes down to the cometition.

Barlow in DT, Watson in SC.

[MGK1]

I know Jobe has been a consistant player BUT I think the lack of midfield depth at the bombers could hurt him a bit. (due to taggers). ATM he would be an upgrade target if he has a big start :)

[CFC 1979]

Micky B

as long as Lyon doesn't try some of his crap

[Justin Bieber]

Barlow cause he's a gun

[Purple 77]

Barlow cause he's a gun

Think Watson's stats stand up pretty well...

[elephants]

Both are guns but for this... BARLOW!!