Brown+Grimes VS Zaha+Conca

Started by Adamant, January 18, 2012, 04:43:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which combo is better?

Jonothan Brown + Jack Grimes
12 (80%)
David Zaharakis + Reece Conca
3 (20%)

Total Members Voted: 0

Adamant

Which combo is better? please vote  :)

Purple 77

Well, if fit, JB and Grimesy are both premiums in their own right. Conca won't get there this year, but he and Zaha are probably the safer options. But i would go JB and grimesy easy, if works, they will reward you greatly

Colliwobblers

i would have said zaka and conca and both are in my team at the moment, but recently been hearing all sorts of "concerns" on zaka's apparant injury issues (knees/tendons) sounds bad, could have one of three effects, none he will still improve 5-15 points and thats why i have him, 2- limit him to where he is at currently and allow no improvement (makes me think maybe better options im picking him to improve), 3- he gets injured, or rested, or drops in output, any of that and obviously he is a bad choice.

So Jury out on Aaka, as for Conca, he needs a breakout 2nd year and has the potential and the opportunity playing midfield this season but obviously its a risk, and the otehr two brown and grimes health risks but guns if fit.

So for me I'm going to say Brown and Grimes, but my coice is still zaka and conca, i'm just not sure its the right one anymore ...

Wbdfan

Wat about zaha and grimes that's prob Wat I'll have unless one has a turn for the worst

Adamant

Quote from: Colliwobblers on January 18, 2012, 11:12:16 PM
i would have said zaka and conca and both are in my team at the moment, but recently been hearing all sorts of "concerns" on zaka's apparant injury issues (knees/tendons) sounds bad, could have one of three effects, none he will still improve 5-15 points and thats why i have him, 2- limit him to where he is at currently and allow no improvement (makes me think maybe better options im picking him to improve), 3- he gets injured, or rested, or drops in output, any of that and obviously he is a bad choice.

So Jury out on Aaka, as for Conca, he needs a breakout 2nd year and has the potential and the opportunity playing midfield this season but obviously its a risk, and the otehr two brown and grimes health risks but guns if fit.

So for me I'm going to say Brown and Grimes, but my coice is still zaka and conca, i'm just not sure its the right one anymore ...
Thanks for the heads up on Zaha. do you have a source?

Manbearpig

Quote from: Wbdfan on January 18, 2012, 11:15:53 PM
Wat about zaha and grimes that's prob Wat I'll have unless one has a turn for the worst

Fo shizz. I have both atm.

Colliwobblers

Quote from: Adamant on January 18, 2012, 11:43:36 PM
Quote from: Colliwobblers on January 18, 2012, 11:12:16 PM
i would have said zaka and conca and both are in my team at the moment, but recently been hearing all sorts of "concerns" on zaka's apparant injury issues (knees/tendons) sounds bad, could have one of three effects, none he will still improve 5-15 points and thats why i have him, 2- limit him to where he is at currently and allow no improvement (makes me think maybe better options im picking him to improve), 3- he gets injured, or rested, or drops in output, any of that and obviously he is a bad choice.

So Jury out on Aaka, as for Conca, he needs a breakout 2nd year and has the potential and the opportunity playing midfield this season but obviously its a risk, and the otehr two brown and grimes health risks but guns if fit.

So for me I'm going to say Brown and Grimes, but my coice is still zaka and conca, i'm just not sure its the right one anymore ...
Thanks for the heads up on Zaha. do you have a source?

http://www.bigpondsport.com/dream-team-builder-david-zaharakis/tabid/91/newsid/82816/default.aspx

http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,46082.0.html