Suckling or Birchill ??

[chaosAD]

Who do u think ? I have Sucks but maybe Birch is more consistent ? Sucks has a higher sealing though

[bowyanger]

Go Birchill he does have a higher sealing.

Also as an added free bonus, when you woch him play, you can get really fraustrated at the amownt of times he kicks it a short distanse and then turns it over to the oppersition, and then they will kick a sosagge roll.

Its orsome

[Football Factory]

Who do u think ? I have Sucks but maybe Birch is more consistent ? Sucks has a higher sealing though

I agree ... toss a coin

[DT Gun]

Go Birchill he does have a higher sealing.

Also as an added free bonus, when you woch him play, you can get really fraustrated at the amownt of times he kicks it a short distanse and then turns it over to the oppersition, and then they will kick a sosagge roll.

Its orsome

NO NO NO NO NOOOOOOOOO!

Stop guessing. Suckling has the potential to score heigher, but birchall is a hell of a lot more consistant.

[Colliwobblers]

why would you want either on the round 13 bye with Goddard,Delidio,Scottland?

Thats not what you asked, suckling pig for me. yeah up and down but more points in the end.

[elephants]

Agree with Colli.

I'm missing Conca, Lids and Goddard in round 13 anywho so not for me. I'd go the Sucker if i was after one of them.

[Adamant]

Ive got the same question, I guess Suckling for higher scores and Birchall for consistency. Suckling's consistency may improve as he's getting older whereas higher ceilings are much harder to come by but I still dont know who to choose!

[aces-high]

Birchall is so damn consistent i'd go him.
Just pointing out if u did choose suckling no one has really mentioned him but i rate and feel P. Hanley from the lions may break out further and average similar or more than suckers. Hanley avoids the hectic premium defender bye w/e, is a tad cheaper and may be someone who takes the punt on hims hero. :P