Suckling and Christensen or Sidebottom and Lake

Started by chaosAD, January 13, 2012, 12:03:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

chaosAD


kilbluff1985

Suckling and Christensen, Lake is to much of a risk wont even be considered for my team.

Suckling gets extra points for doing the kick in duties i think.

Loose

In a similar boat as Sidebottom and Christensen are fighting for the same position in my team along with possibly Didak as they all share the bye.

Lake is too much of a risk for me full stop. Hes not going to be a keeper and he prob wont play 22 games so id rather take a rookie and save 130K.

Suclking is also a bit of a big risk, not sure where he will play this year.


Hippo


longytap

#4
Sidebottom and Lake every day of the week!
People have short memories, it was only one year ago that Lake was a top three DT backman.
To get i guy like Lake, with runs on the board who can avg 100 and has in the past, not to mention great durability prior to last year for under 300k is a gamble worth taking. As for Sidebottom 3rd year i think?,durable and has been training with the mids all pre season.

In comparison, Suckling's had one good year before which he was a 50avg, and Christianson also only has 1 year of exposed form.
Don't get me wrong, both terrific young players who i really rate, But i know which two i'll be picking.

Hippo

Suckling has had one good yr! -  he has only played one yr!

you might as well consider him a rookie with only 6 games in his career before hand.

Lake still not training with the regular group and has had serious problem vs pretty much a 2nd yr rookie who in my eyes avg 90 in his first yr of AFL games + is the zone breaker with his pin point kick

yeah i had Lake in my team up till a few days ago but i wouldn't say everyday of the week go Lake - maybe 4 days of the week  :P

Ziplock

one year ago western bulldogs were a top 4, top 8, top 10 side.