Heppell vs birchall/carrazzo and a zero

[starz]

What's the better idea. Thoughts much appreciated is the one zero worth it or not

[starz]

So if I go with say heppell I won't cop a zero in round 13 hopefully. However if I go with the round 13 Byers I will cop a zero. However I believe they are better than heppell howeve heppell is rumoured to moe to the midfield

[stew42]

If you have a Round 13 rook, just upgrade him by then

[starz]

You see my backline is:

Scotland god delidio ????? Duffield Clarke spurr
Morris seriakowski

[stew42]

Spurr won't get elevated unless there is a LTI in the Freo side. Drop him.

So start off with the guy you think will average most (probably Birch), and upgrade Morris by Round 13

[starz]

But that means I'll have 2 donuts come round 13

[stew42]

oh, okay, well you have three premos who have bye in rnd 13, so you're going to have a donut from the start. Swap Scotland to Shaw or similar and then see above. It's only if you have three or more Premos with the same bye that you have to worry :)

[lolrocket]

You already have 3 rd 13 premiums so I wouldn't get Birchall or Carrazzo.

Shaw and Enright are other options to think about

If you make sure that Morris gets traded out by then and that you don't trade in anyone else with a rd 13 bye then you will get away with it with one donut like everyone else will at some stage as well.

Between Shaw and Heppell I'd say

[owenbond007]

If you go with only one r13 in middle you could play 3 premos in the back