Which ruckman below Cox?

Started by gpdemons, August 15, 2011, 12:36:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which ruckman should I get for Kreuzer? Can afford anyone but Cox.

Goldstein
6 (17.6%)
Mumford
12 (35.3%)
McEvoy
6 (17.6%)
Sandilands
4 (11.8%)
Leuenberger
4 (11.8%)
Petrie
2 (5.9%)

Total Members Voted: 3

gpdemons

Soo who should I get in for Kreuzer, he's pissing me off and he has the bye in a couple, cant afford his crap in finals! So who should I get? Obvious choice seems Goldstein, but is Sandi worth having a look at? That way I could still have some cash for further trades. Help would be appreciated.

meow meow

As if you don't already have Petrie?

Get Mummy. Sandilands is still not right. Goldstein has dopey eyes.

roo boys!

Goldstein faces Sandi/Clarke in the ruck this week, so I would take Mummy.

ossie85


charliesheen

#4
I would say McEvoy & Goldstein have both proven themselves against both top 8 and bottom 8 opposition.  Both have shown they are capable of 100+ scores against top class opposition like the Pies/Cats/etc.  Goldstein has Richmond in the league grand grand finals which makes him the most appealing.

Mumford has the most favorable schedule out of the lot and has shown encouraging form.  However, I would put him below McEvoy & Goldstein, simply because there is less sample data to work with.

Leuy has been in form, but has a tough couple games to work with the Pies followed by WCE.  BL are not exactly the best clearance team either.

Sandilands is coming off a lay off, and could be put on cotton wool any minute.  Not sure its worth the risk.

wardie

MUMMY for me, Sydney play a game style based around stoppages and clearances and MUMMY is like another mid with his tackling and follow up work.

Picked him up for JAMAR last week and have been happy with his output.