SANDI named, but is mark harvey clever enough to just be playing funny-buggers?

[bluedreamin]

You have to have a mind to play mind games.
Harvey is completely unpredictable and frustrating but I would be astonished if he made the same mistake twice with Sandilands.

[HevvieEvvie]

It'll be up to the fitness staff either way. If it was up to Harvey he would of played last week

[thewizz]

Need to trade out Petrie and am thinking about 211. Am I crazy? Also thinking about Mummy and McEvoy.
Any advice would be great.

[Turbo]

I have 211, cos I have kept him the whole time as a POD.  In your position I would be looking at getting Mumford.

[thebrock7]

Looks like Harvey is getting his way. I hope he gets through okay and with a decent score.

[duff100au]

Have held sandi all this time. Mainly coz Z smith has been good enough really as cover and i had other positions to fix. But this week i can't decide whether i should trade him for mumford and then i'll have enough $$ so i can upgrade heppell to suckling. Or keep sandi and hope for the 120's and keep heppell to the end basically.

[fever]

this is my dilemma. should i assume this is legit or would you trade him anyway?

i only have 2 trades left and face an elimination final this week in the league i care about. one trade will be heppel->bock, should the other be sandi->mummy? i love the thought of him coming back and scoring 100+ and having one last trade up my sleeve in case i get through, but a 0 would surely sink me.

any freo ppl here know how good a chance he is to play?

[coolfugitiv0]

Anyone else noticed that he'a named in a forward pocket?
He'll play, but don't expect him to pull out a decent score this week..

[almax]

named in the forward pocket yes, but he could go for 10 contested marks and 5 goals, who is big enough in the Carlton backline to spoil him?

[fever]

do we still seriously think players actually play where theyre named?

he may get more time fwd but he will definitly ruck if he plays.