How much is to much on ruckman?

Started by A TEAM, February 25, 2009, 06:12:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

A TEAM

February 25, 2009, 06:12:54 AM
How much is to much to spend on ruckman?

atm i've spent about 1mill on ruckman. thats without cox or sandilands
and includes my 2 bench players.

Just like to get an idea on how much everyone else has spent on theres?
(i don't want to know what players you have. cos that would be cheating.
just a rough idea on combined total of all 4 players)

chris

#1
February 25, 2009, 06:17:01 AM
about 1m and 120k including Cox

mEnty

#2
February 25, 2009, 07:42:19 AM
about 1.1m for me

A TEAM

#3
February 25, 2009, 09:18:02 AM
just got cox, but still think he won't do aswell as last year.

1.2mil spent now

Alex7089

#4
February 25, 2009, 09:46:43 PM
I have spent about 1.2 mil on rucks...

Hawks_1976

#5
February 25, 2009, 11:24:20 PM
Looks to be a trend here.
$1.13M for me.
I personally think Cox is more of a lock in DT than SC, the pack will start to catch up to Cox in SC this year IMO.

A TEAM

#6
February 26, 2009, 05:31:06 AM
yeah just got a bad feeling about cox this year? but u have to get him cos he's such a high scorer when he is on song!
I Think hille is in for a big year. 20+ possesions and gets down the ground and kicks a lot of goals. its either cox or hille?
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions