The great debate, which rookie would you choose?

[theswiz]

Decisions decisions...Lynch has better JS and a better average but isn't DPP

[mikeg12]

I will be choosing Smith if he is named this week

[Chelskiman]

I will be choosing Smith if he is named this week

+1

[BillMurray]

I will be choosing Smith if he is named this week

+2

[PowerBug]

I will be choosing Smith if he is named this week

+3

30k less and will get roughly the same return and DPP.

[FLOPITOUT1]

Smith cos i already have him  :D

[Bak2Form]

I will be choosing Smith if he is named this week

+3

30k less and will get roughly the same return and DPP.

+4 if u have too choose one of them, im waiting and going mzungu

[Joe Dirt]

Who would you pick out of smith and jacobs?

[Ziplock]

Jacobs, no question, easily the same if not better scoring potential, better JS and is also mpp.

Out of Smith and Lynch... line ball, I wouldn't want to call it

Lynch has- a lower BE, better JS, will chop up against poor sides, will probably got 70+ normally and probably 50ish against teams like collingwood and geelong.

and he comes with a extra 30k price tag.

Smith- is dpp, but relatively low job security playing in a side that's coming third (that I tipped for top 4 this year ;) ), is cheaper and will probably be more consistent (that being said, won't get as many high scores as lynch)

I would be going... lynch.. but that's because I already have a number of hawks in my team that with smith would just be bordering ridiculous.

[ronl]

If you have Jacobs, then obviously Smith because of DPP.  Although Lynch will make you heaps of money in a big hurry.  According to the Too Serious stats he'll jump $75,000 next week (breakeven -87).

[Bak2Form]

Who would you pick out of smith and jacobs?

jacobs