Suckling or Puopolo?

Started by JR23, May 20, 2011, 10:55:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

JR23

my backs are

deledio, adcock, goddard, shaw, heppell, gibbs, lower   (toy, coad, hibberd)


is it better to go  toy --> puopolo and thats it  (no cash to double trade this week)

or go   curnow --> jacobs   and    lower (or toy) to Suckling?

is puopolo worth passing over? and is suckling THAT good?

pies101

why dont you keep toy and replace coad is who injured??

fertalong

I'm in a very similar situation as you, and I think I decided to pass up puopolo for suckling. I don't have hibberd yet, and don't want to play bewick this week as my 7th mid so I'm going with:
Lower -> Suckling
Curnow -> Hibberd

JR23

im leaning towards going curnow to jacobs, and toy to suckling... that way i can always use the cash lower has made to upgrade someone else down the line. so many IFs tho. what is suckling drops off. what if puopolo develops into a keeper. what if my rooks get the boot like toy did? DT is racking my brain!

thatguy

Quote from: pies101 on May 20, 2011, 11:17:38 AM
why dont you keep toy and replace coad is who injured??
would make more sense