Enright vs. Suckling

Started by bigsy, May 17, 2011, 08:22:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Which one would be a better trade in?

Corey Enright
Matt Suckling

bomberboy0618

Quote from: bigsy on May 18, 2011, 05:15:44 PM
Quote from: thatguy on May 18, 2011, 11:19:05 AM
black listed heath shaw is very close to coming off that list with his current form! and i hate admitting it!

sorry i don't understand what you mean by that
Means he didnt ever want to pick him but might have to because of awesome form.

MissPiesFF

Quote from: ossie85 on May 18, 2011, 09:22:15 AM

Enright!!

What's with all the Suckling love? Enright is a proven champion. When in doubt, pick the better player. Not like Geelong aren't playing well. Yes, Enright will get cheaper, but I'd wait.

Heath Shaw could will Collingwood's best and fairest at this rate and is a huge chance for All-Aus, reckon he's stepped up this year.
Your not gonna pull a Q on us are ya Oss? ha

Holz

Quote from: Fenno on May 18, 2011, 05:23:51 PM
Quote from: thatguy on May 18, 2011, 11:19:05 AM
black listed heath shaw is very close to coming off that list with his current form! and i hate admitting it!
Im exactly the same. But if I do the unthinkable and get him he is sure to punish me with his inconsistant crap

i wanted to bring in shaw or carrots for brougton and did a post about it and got smashed with people calling it a dumb move, i dont think i can handle bringing these guys in 50k more than what i was planning on getting them in for. I playing Dt very cautiously now so i mbringing in scotland instead, averaged 90+ last year and will od the same this year, wont give you a 140 but will post a 70-110 score everyweek.

Ziplock

league, you go for consistency. Overall, you take the risks I guess :P

FLOPITOUT1

I hate to say it but Adcock wouldn't be a bad choice on current form and the fact he hasn't missed 3 games yet  ;)