Selection dilemma

Started by Memphistopheles, May 12, 2011, 08:55:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Memphistopheles

Is it worth possibly playing a weaker player in your backline just so you have an emergency in your midfield?

Currently I have no emergency in my midfield (depending on Wallis' status). If Wallis isn't selected is it better for me to ddp God or Lids with Hibberd, push Swallow (he's my worst starting mid) to the bench for them, and start Stanley for God/Lids in my defence?

Essentially it's a choice between playing Stanley and Swallow. Swallow is better but, if i play Stanley I get a mid emergence and if I pick Swallow I dont.

I'm not going to make a trade to cover having no mid emergencies and there are no other options for me to get a mid emergency.

Also if you opt to go with Swallow and no emergency would you choose Lower or Stanley as your 7th def?

Ziplock

think of it this way, by not dpping, you could potentially lose 70-100 points. By dpping, you could lose maybe 10-30 points.

Clear cut decision for me :)

:-X