ruck trade

[mikeg12]

bit lost re which 1 of these blokes to trade out.  cant find much info about return times or injuries. (except Campbell is about 6 weeks away or something?)  and not sure if bailey will even get a game this year?

vote away!

[boo-yaa]

who are your other 2 rucks.

i'm in a similar spot with cox and sandi, but then keefe and broc.
i'm not going to trade in for smith because i think its a waste of a trade.
however i'm only going for a league win and may be stuffed for WCE 2nd bye.

[mikeg12]

i have cox and sandi on the pitch

[boo-yaa]

pitches are for fags, its called a field.

but yeh, same boat as me, and i'm thinking its a waste unless someone can convice me otherwise to bring in smith.

[McRooster]

Q. Why did Hawthorn recruit David Hale?  ;)

A. Max Bailey is an injury prone spud  :P

*Shane Warne took 700+ Test wickets on a cricket PITCH - is he a fag?  ;)

Not that there's anything wrong with that......

[Scotch]

Q. Why did Hawthorn recruit David Hale?  ;)

A. Max Bailey is an injury prone spud  :P

*Shane Warne took 700+ Test wickets on a cricket PITCH - is he a fag?  ;)

Not that there's anything wrong with that......

Haven't had the chance to ask him.

[Jackina]

Max Bailey. If he plays it will be amazing but he's so injury prone it will be hard for him to keep getting matches.

[blah128]

4th ruck shouldn't be too important but you'd definately want your 3rd ruck to get games and score reasonably just in case you need cover. Smith will make some good money so it's not a waste of a trade. I'd lean towards trading Bailey out

[boo-yaa]

not all pitches are for fags then, just football pitches.

[yorgis]

i would go bailey >>>> smith, if you must trade. smith will give you good cover with eagles and docks byes coming up. also wonder about docks naming ext. bench this week. [sandi not right after poke in the eye ?]