McKernan or Knights

[Sammocorw]

Who should I start McKernan or Knights. Whichever I don't start will be emergency

[justi]

Who should I start McKernan or Knights. Whichever I don't start will be emergency

Out of the two I've got McKernan and with Tippett back, he's been named on the bench and as a result will probably get less game time. He's in my backline and I'll start him but that's through a lack of options and the fact that he scored 83 and with less game time I reckon he should be able to manage 60+ which is reasonable. But Knights is a mid-pricer and if you're fair dinkum about him, he should be started. What's he in your team for!

[thornz23]

Who should I start McKernan or Knights. Whichever I don't start will be emergency

Out of the two I've got McKernan and with Tippett back, he's been named on the bench and as a result will probably get less game time. He's in my backline and I'll start him but that's through a lack of options and the fact that he scored 83 and with less game time I reckon he should be able to manage 60+ which is reasonable. But Knights is a mid-pricer and if you're fair dinkum about him, he should be started. What's he in your team for!

spot on mate. u can't sit mid pricers on ure bench while your rookies play. u had faith in him to buy him as a mid pricer, therefore he has to be on field. if u dnt think he can outscore ure rookies u may as well trade him out asap for a rookie who u think can match him

[Holz]

shouldn't even have to think about it, knights is a experienced player who nearly cracked 80 last game and if given enough mid time could push for 100.

[thanme]

I don't have Knights, but McKernan will be warming the bench for me this week.

[dockerone]

shouldn't even have to think about it, knights is a experienced player who nearly cracked 80 last game and if given enough mid time could push for 100.

A HUGE +1 Holz

[Bak2Form]

i think ur poll of 19-1 says it all

[j959]

poll is a landslide ...

McKernan a good rookie but ...

he might be a sub this wk??  ???