Chris Knights must have?

[Junktimer]

Just wondering what people think here.

I think he has the potential to be an absolute bargain, and he has been in and out of my side.  His body is always a worry.

A bye in round 2 I think is good, rookies are a very likely to play round 2 had they played round 1, which is probably going to be 99% of rookies we all have!

Thoughts?

[Big Ange]

yeah gotta get knights as a cheap forward either him or ryan gamble as ur 6th 7th forward 

[FonFatty]

I have been umming and arring with knights from the get go.. I really rate him as a player.. I can also see him being part of the midfield rotation, if he can go back to his best, $237k is an absolute steal.. I am also questioning his durability.. I have been tossing up Gamble as well, the saints have a pretty good track record with recycled players.. Decisions....

[FonFatty]

I sort of agree with you, if Knights duds it up, you can sideways trade to Petrie if he is peaking.. But do you really want to burn trades on that sort of stuff? Knights is a risky pick but if he comes out and gets back to his best you will realistically be saving a trade because everyone will be jumping on before the price rise...

[MajorLazer]

He's too injury prone for my liking. Petrie is ahead of him right now, but it's not certain that Petire will be in there either.

[HotTiges]

Knights vs Petrie vs Yarran for me.. cannot decide..

[Boomz]

Too injury prone for me...

[cramers15]

Gamble is more likely to play 22 games but you would have to think knights has the potential to score more. with kraks there aswell it has to be gamble or knights, probably gamble for mine.

[tferrier18]

Petrie is safer...plus adelaide are shi*