4th mid

[thiv]

should i get boyd or mitchell?
not many have mitchell, but isn't he just a fallen premium???
other options include coooney and maybe burgoyne? what are ur thoughts?

which one of the 4?

A- boyd
B- cooney
C- mitchell
D- burgoyne

other mid premiums are swan, selwood and murphy

[Alex7089]

Burgoyne for me, he should outscore Boyd because his disposal is a lot better, and he handballs less, Cooney and Mitchell are inconsistent.

[sid3bysid3]

cooney is coming off a a serious injury.

i think out of the list you gave boyd... he is a solid contributor.

[meow meow]

Martin

[Purple 77]

well i'm not leaning towards any of them, but if you had to choose one, i'd go boyd

[enzedder]

If you can afford Boyd with a 107 ave in 2010 then he'd have to be the one. Cooney was fine for me last year but I wouldn't rush to get him again. Mitchell got me thinking at his price but last year is the reason he's so cheap in comparison to other premiums. I don't consider Burgoyne to a premium or keeper just yet.

[nas]

Martin

& your reasoning?

[meow meow]

Will improve this year i believe. I can see him averaging 100. Another to consider would be Rockliff. 420ish and averaged 97 in the second half of last year.