boyd v watson?

[jordan5]

 ???

[meow meow]

Doesn't matter. Boyd if you care about going for the league win, due to Watson's bye in the GF. But both will be solid and you will definitely get what you pay for either way.

[CuStArDaRm]

Watson is better suited to SC

[wcarey]

boyd hands down, especially with the coon back and sherman = probably more freedom

[Big_Cox14]

Boyd.

[Usman]

boyd hands down, especially with the coon back and sherman = probably more freedom

More Freedom? He couldnt get any less attention if he went to an all lesbian bar. Teams purposely dont go near him cause most of the time he kicks it back to them anyway, its like having 19 men on the field.

[wcarey]

ok usman

[Usman]

But seriously teams will never tag him his disposal is that poor he doesnt need the extra pressure so they tag the class players like cooney and griffen. His makes boyd a good pick cause he will always score well with no attention. while watson is a one man midfield that gets all the attention

[meow meow]

Boyd wins the hard ball before other players have a chance to. Same as Watson, Swallow, Ablett, Judd and Pendlebury. You simply cannot tag them and stop this. Both players will be great picks and they will not fluctuate in price/score much either way.

[ando_10]

boyd stat machine turns it over a bit so better suited to DT.
i had him last year can be frustrating.

[j959]

ah, so that's why his avg is lower in SC ... i never noticed before due to his hard-ball gets probably blinding me to the poor disposal/turnovers!   ;)

[MightyLions]

Boyd for consistency.

[Usman]

ah, so that's why his avg is lower in SC ... i never noticed before due to his hard-ball gets probably blinding me to the poor disposal/turnovers!   

actually there are a huge amount of players that get the hard-ball more % wise than Boyd its his clearance work that covers up his extremely poor disposal.

[meow meow]

Get Tuck instead.