Risky team - feed back please

[spock18]

I'm starting two rookies in both def and mid. Which obviously in total is four which is no different too most teams, just they are only spread across two sections. The reason being I beleive there is no extremley outstanding forward or ruck rookies to start, besides Krakour who will hopefully become a keeper. Tell me what you think.

DEF - Goddard, Gibbs, Deledio, Broughton, Grimes, Otten, Heppell. EMG - Toy, Duigan, Puopolo.
MID - Swan, Boyd, Anthony, Foley, Swallow, Gaff. EMG - Harris, Atley, I.Smith.
RUCK - Cox, Petrie. EMG - Z.Smith, Bailey.
FWD - Chapman, Franklin, Sylvia, Goodes, N.Riewoldt, Knights, Krakouer. EMG - Mzungu, Richardson, Callinan.

Another risk was Cox, but on research he has a higher ceiling then Sandilands, and I beleive last year he was simply higher than Sandilands.
Please leave some feedback, Thanks!

[spock18]

I beleive last year he was simply injured, leading to lack of form and points.*

[mattpedo]

TO RISKY....

But to win the overall i guess being risky will be the only way to win it!

nice team thou..

4 rookies + Kraks+ players returning from LTI's PETRIE(should be fine) FOLEY(WHO KNOWS) HIGGINS(Should be fine) OTTEN(Should be fine), GRIMES(Should be fine) and KNIGHTS(Should be fine)...

RISKY RISKY RISKY...

[spock18]

Don't know where you got Higgins from but thanks for the feedback

[DT87]

I don't think there is anything risky about starting the four cheapies that you have since they should all be pretty good DT scorers, though we can't be too sure about Heppell yet.

I can only give this a 7/10, mainly because you simply have too many injury prone players. Also, you have bye clashes in the forward line.

[spock18]

I'm guessing you're refering to the round 16 Ade,Fre, Mel bye week. I see Callinan or Mzungu or maybe both as downgraded by then so that shouldn't be a problem. But thanks for the feedback