Malceski as 5th Defender

Started by craftcoat, February 03, 2011, 12:32:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

craftcoat


So atm im seeing Adcock in the 5th position of most people's defence lines (mine  included) but having Petrie, Knights & Anthony all coming back from injury as well Iv'e decided to upgrade Jed Adcock to Malceski. Im not seeing Nick in many teams at all this year which is a tad surprising as he had a very solid season last yr (played all 22) and looks to be heading back to his slutty DT ways lol. Malceski as a unique is a tantalising affair imo ;)

Keen to get anyones thoughts on this move? ta

:)


RiOtChEsS

irratic scores last year, if he can become a little more consistent could become an elite back...

Windigo

Adcock is a good player and real cheap for a player that can score well.

Had horror 2010. Many vacancies at Brisbane for him to step up.

ronl

I think the reason Nick's scores became messy towards the end of last year was that he simply ran out of condition.  Will be fitter this year.  I still like him more in SC than DT.  Could do a lot worse, if you like him grab him.
As for Adcock, I've taken the punt on injury prone players and have lost too many times.  He's a great player and good value, if you've got the nerve.

dread_lord09


Holz

if you want to avoid any potential inkuries than going malcheski isnt the best way he has just as bad if not worst injury history than adcock. In my opinion you are choosing between 2 players who are likely to averge the same and essentially the same injury risk except you are payign alot more than i am