chapman or riewoldt?

billy95 · April 22, 2009, 09:47:09 PM

korza · April 22, 2009, 10:07:11 PM

Go Bald, with Ling out for a month, i would think Chappy will get more than his normal share in the midfield.

hibbo · April 22, 2009, 11:17:10 PM

Riewoldt all day long. He will not get any cheaper and is just warming up. Will be the best forward this year by a mile!

chris5judd · April 23, 2009, 12:43:43 AM

Agree with hibbo - get him next week though - his average against the Power is only 71 - he may still drop in price - but maybe again - he might have another big one.

reconfig · April 23, 2009, 01:08:07 AM

the volt...... chapman will do a hammy later in the season, which may cost you some points

StantonLEGEND · April 23, 2009, 05:56:29 AM

id personaly go for stanton

Scratchy · April 23, 2009, 07:33:49 AM

lol he's clearly looking for a forward, but thanks for playing StantonLEGEND.

I'd go chapman because of riewoldt's record (avg 71 vs Port AND against Bulldogs) and ling being out.

And unlike some players with low averages against certain opposition this isn't just because of a few bad games early in his career, last 5 games vs Power = 73, 62 (08), 36 (07), 74, 72 (06)...No tonnes against them since 2004.
And against Bulldogs 78, 59, 115, and 77 in his past 4...not exactly premium material.

Go Chappy, a BE of 77 and with Ling out...

hibbo · April 23, 2009, 07:53:11 AM

I'm pretty sure billy is looking for a player that he will keep longer then 2 games. In the long run, Riewoldt is your man. BUT, if rooy does fail against power & dogs then his price will drop nicely. BUT, it only takes one game to turn that bad form around and this could be the year...even with those averages in mind i'd still go Riewoldt.

lolitsgaz · April 23, 2009, 08:30:10 AM

Getting Rooey in this week will be the cheapest all year unless he has a really bad game against port but i think his be is like 70-80 something and saints are on fire at the moment this year + i already got chapman.