What to do with...

[Arradin]

Alright everyone this is my question, and please vote and comment

These are my options (seems like a lot but just setting out for the poll)

Option 1
Trade gysberts to montagna, leaving banner for cover and leave kennedy/dangerfield in fwds

Option 2
Trade Banner to Boyd, no midfield cover and upgrade kennedy to nick riewoldt

Option 3
Trade Banner to Boyd, no midfield cover and upgrade Dangerfield to nick riewoldt

Option 4
Trade Banner to montagna, no midfield cover and upgrade kennedy to nick riewoldt

Option 5
Trade Banner to montagna, no midfield cover and upgrade Dangerfield to nick riewoldt


Team is ($325,900 and 6 trades left)

Backs
Hodge, Goddard, Malceski, Duffield, Enright, Waters, Hargrave
res - Strijk, Ashley Smith

Mids
Swan, Ablett, Selwood, Gibbs, Stanton, Banner
res - gysberts, shuey

Rucks
Sandilands, Cox
res - warnock, roughead

Fwds
Pavlich, Giansiracusa, O'Keefe, Franklin, Brown, Rockliffe, Kennedy
res - Dangerfield, Dennis-Lane

[RiOtChEsS]

shuey might be back soon, option 2 ;)

[dockerone]

I would go with option 2 as well then next week you can trade in whoever goes better out of Hardingham/Harwood/MacMillan/Speight etc as cover for mids

[Arradin]

seems like most people would trade out kennedy instead of dangerfield.
Kennedy has an avg of 75 for season and 77 last 3 weeks while dangerfield has an avg of 67 and 68 for last 3 weeks. And it looks like the eagles have a better run home. so just wondering why??

[thornz23]

i guess dangers just has more potential reli.. He can play up the ground a lot more and if west coast are playing a good team theres not much incoming ball to the forward line for kennedy to get his hands on.

[Arradin]

in terms of if eagles come up against a good team they have freo, bris, port, north and geelong so really only freo and geelong are good (maybe bris)
while adelaide has rich, wb, bris, coll, st kilda so adelaide has a much harder run home in terms of good teams

also in terms of potential of 2010
Kennedy - 3 highest scores 112, 101, 118
                 3 lowest scores 56, 51, 50
Dangerfield - 3 highest scores 94, 87, 81
                     3 lowest scores 30(hurt 3rd quarter), 51, 56

so wouldnt it seem that kennedy would have a higher potential seeming that he has a higher avg, a higher ceiling for bigger scores and his lower scores are the same if not better than dangerfields. He is also managing this in a side that is struggling and has very poor delivery into the fwd line.

[dockerone]

Fair point Arradin - I change my opinion to option 3. Can't argue with the facts  ;D

[Dave085]

6 trades left so youre pretty sweet to get cover if needed.

[Arradin]

alright everyone an hour to go before lockout. only 5 replies out of 150 views cmon guys you can do better than that!
plus this is a must win for me  :)

Thanks guys ended up going banner to boyd and dangerfield to st nick