hespey's top 1,000 team

Started by hespey, March 17, 2010, 02:47:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

rate it

10/10
1 (14.3%)
10/10
1 (14.3%)
10/10
1 (14.3%)
10/10
2 (28.6%)
10/10
2 (28.6%)

Total Members Voted: 2

SC Slave

MY EYES!!!!!  :'(

AND ill never get that 20 second back, ever!

hespey

Goddard
Enright
Duffield
Hodge
Malceski
Hunt
Waters
emergencies
Maguire
Silvagni

\

Ablett
Mitchell
Ball
McVeigh
Trengove
Martin
emergencies
Barlow
Shuey

\

Sandilands
Tippitt
emergencies
Lobbe
Grimley

\

Riewoldt
OKeefe
Pavlich
Higgins
Hall
Ziebell
Hitchcock
emergencies
Gumbleton
Podsiadly


please post your team if you think it has less holes than this one and i'll happily comment!!

Griffo1982

I think the fwd line is the major concern cuz hall could snap & get rubbed out for life, higgins is injury prone & theres no assurances that gumby, hitchcock & POD will get regular games. Not sure what the answer is but def worth looking at other options.

toodledock

Quote from: hespey on March 18, 2010, 01:39:48 PM
seems that the critics have spoken with 0/10 all round...

anyone got any whitw pointers on where i could improve a ton?


Jump off a cliff

ShrewDext

Tippett and Lobbe both in the rucks loses the benefit of MPP.

Move Tippett FWD for Higgins perhaps (only a suggestion) and consider a Prem Ruck.

hespey

#20
currently ranked 945 (eye of horus)

what do you like, and what can i improve??

hodge
shaw
malceski
enright
gilbee
waters
kennelly
emer.
maguire
davis


ablett (c)
judd
barlow
gibbs
cross
martin
emer.
bastinac
jetta



sandilands
hille
emer.
warnock
lobbe



okeefe
brown
pavlich
higgins
hall
rioli
podsiadly
emer.
gumbleton
hitchcock


thanks for any feedback  :)

Justin Bieber

Looks pretty good for next few weeks 8). How many trades have you used?

Maybe look at upgrading hille soon to a Kreuz/Jolly/Hmac/Cox. Sets your rucks up for the year after that.

Master Q

Quote from: Hellopplz on April 28, 2010, 07:15:53 AM
Looks pretty good for next few weeks 8). How many trades have you used?

Maybe look at upgrading hille soon to a Kreuz/Jolly/Hmac/Cox. Sets your rucks up for the year after that.

hespey

Not many trades left... should I use any to upgrade any players in the coming weeks or is my team set??

6 trades.. 50k.. rank 954.. 


GODDARD
HODGE
GILBEE
MALCESKI
ENRIGHT
SHAW
KENNELLY
davis
webberley


ABLETT
BARLOW
CROSS
GIBBS
JUDD
DALSANTO
howlett
jetta


SANDILANDS
COX
warnock
lobbe


PAVLICH
BROWN
OKEEFE
HIGGINS
PODSIADLY
HALL
RIOLI
gumbleton
hitchcock



Master Q

Team is almost set, if their you are able to get rid of Rioli and Hall, that would be great. 8.9/10

hespey

#25
thanks for the feedback master Q, exactly what I was thinking in regards to the weak links.

rioli has been copping tags and cant seem to break them. but now that burgoyne/mitchell might be coming back in, im hoping he will cop less attention and can sneak forward for goals.

bazza is a worry. i knew he would be up and down, guess i was hoping his downs would be 60s and not 30s, and was hoping for a better ratio. still early days for him though.



do you think it is worth trading them? for say.. a chapman and a cheapie and playing gumbleton? or would the rioli/hall combo be better than chapman/gumbleton? this would cost me 4 trades.. leaving only 2 for injuries  :o :o :o :o :o :o

Alex7089

Whatever you do don't leave yourself with 2 trades. 2 injuries in half a season you are bound to cop 0's. I;ll have 10 left after trading out Drummo and Hall. Then 2 max 3 players left to upgrade. team almost set for me to.

Master Q

Quote from: Alex7089 on May 13, 2010, 06:44:50 AM
Whatever you do don't leave yourself with 2 trades. 2 injuries in half a season you are bound to cop 0's. I;ll have 10 left after trading out Drummo and Hall. Then 2 max 3 players left to upgrade. team almost set for me to.
Have to agree on that, I would leave your team as is this round, unless your desperate to get rid of Hall. See if there are any stand out Rookie Forwards this round, and if so, downgrade Hall/Rioli then upgrade the other.

If the Rookie is worse then Gumby, play Gumby (obviously), and vise versa