What Option - Lose Harbrow or Medders?

[BGK]

My last topic for trades.

Which would be a better option

1. Harbrow to Silvagni saving $254,600.

2. Medhurst to Peterson saving $194,700

Im making two trades this week to fix a few issues.

The other trade is Hall to Brown. Costing an extra $134,600.

If I went for the Harbrow trade i would use Medhurst to trade up to Brown.

Both Harbrow and Medhurst have been a let down so far this year.

I probably have better cover in my defence bench with Hunt and Nason on it. Where on the forwards I have Hitchcock and Gumbleton. If I went with the forward option I would need to play a rookie.

Appreciate your time.

[daddsy404]

definitely harbrow to silvagni, backline rookies can cover it whereas hitchcock and gumbleton are unreliable and probably wont do well

[BGK]

Heath Shaw being out changes matters. But I still have cover on the bench

[BGK]

Im now thinking neither.

[Cicjose]

harbrow is letting you down???? How??? His average scores are higher now than at any time during his career

[BGK]

Yeah I was hoping he would score a little higher. Its not like he is letting me down that much but i see him as a weak point in my team. He would have freed up some extra cash too. But I think i will save the trades.

[Cicjose]

now everyone will need to make a trade this week with Riewoldt tearing his hamstring off the bone against Collingwood in tonight's game