Round 10 VC/C

[Samsturmfels]

Who is everyone considering for VC/C this week?

In the past i have gone with Grundy/Gawn but their form from last week is a bit concerning.

I might do Macrae into Neale due to form.

I also have 22 players on the field so if the VC does well may have to move one of them onto the bench to enable loophole.

Thoughts?

[Wanderer]

I was thinking Macrae into Neale, but not sure about the Dunkley factor, so just going with Neale as VC and hopefully no need to consider anybody else. Richmond don't tag so Neale should be off the leash. If Macrae gets an awkward 130, then there is the whole "what if Neale goes nuts", so just go Neale VC. If Neale fails there are many other players to choose from the remaining games.

[Mat0369]

Macrae into ???

[Ingram]

Is the short break a concern for Neale? Say if the game is in the bag he rests a quarter?

[Goosey]

Neale into ?

[whynot102]

Thinking Neale as VC McCrae didn’t work out

[Wanderer]

Thinking Neale as VC McCrae didn’t work out

Mids don't usually go big against Port and Dunkley coming back was going to impact Macrae. Also, what's with him rucking haha.

[RoughRed]

Thinking Neale as VC McCrae didn’t work out

Mids don't usually go big against Port and Dunkley coming back was going to impact Macrae. Also, what's with him rucking haha.

Disappointing really ... most rucks have gone big this season

[crowls]

Thinking Neale as VC McCrae didn’t work out

Mids don't usually go big against Port and Dunkley coming back was going to impact Macrae. Also, what's with him rucking haha.

Disappointing really ... most rucks have gone big this season

Did Bevo cover off why he rucked in the coaches breifer?

[Samsturmfels]

Thinking Neale as VC McCrae didn’t work out

Mids don't usually go big against Port and Dunkley coming back was going to impact Macrae. Also, what's with him rucking haha.

Disappointing really ... most rucks have gone big this season

Did Bevo cover off why he rucked in the coaches breifer?

didnt watch this game, but Macrae was in the ruck a couple of weeks ago for a few contests in the forward line while English stayed outside of the inside 50.

[bkimm32]

Technical question, does putting the C on a Bye player loophole your VC’s score? or does it have to be someone who’s genuinely missing their round (aka injured, omitted etc.)

Rivers is the only player in my side who is not named to play this weekend, and I’d prefer not to put the C on him to loop whole Neales score as he’s listed as an emergency and I’ve been slack with checking teams right before game starts. If he were a late in; that would flower me. So would pref to put the C on a BYE player if that will work?

[Fid]

Technical question, does putting the C on a Bye player loophole your VC’s score? or does it have to be someone who’s genuinely missing their round (aka injured, omitted etc.)

Rivers is the only player in my side who is not named to play this weekend, and I’d prefer not to put the C on him to loop whole Neales score as he’s listed as an emergency and I’ve been slack with checking teams right before game starts. If he were a late in; that would flower me. So would pref to put the C on a BYE player if that will work?

99.9% sure if you put the C on the bye player you can loop Neales score

[bkimm32]

Technical question, does putting the C on a Bye player loophole your VC’s score? or does it have to be someone who’s genuinely missing their round (aka injured, omitted etc.)

Rivers is the only player in my side who is not named to play this weekend, and I’d prefer not to put the C on him to loop whole Neales score as he’s listed as an emergency and I’ve been slack with checking teams right before game starts. If he were a late in; that would flower me. So would pref to put the C on a BYE player if that will work?

99.9% sure if you put the C on the bye player you can loop Neales score

I thought so, but thought to double check anyway. A 0x2 would be horrible lol.

[oh_lol]

Think I'm going Gawn C. I think he'll produce another big score, not worried about any injuries