Round Twelve Thread - First Split Round!

Started by Jukes, June 02, 2019, 09:59:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Pkbaldy

Quote from: powersuperkents on June 16, 2019, 11:12:13 PM
Quote from: Jukes on June 16, 2019, 10:34:48 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on June 16, 2019, 10:02:00 PM
If we don't name a team, I thought the convention was the previous week's team is named (or fill remaining spots)...

If you hadn’t named a team at all that would be the case - but since a partial/incomplete team was posted it just undergoes the usual procedure as if you had named five guys who weren’t playing as opposed to five blank spots - filled by EMG and then first players alphabetically
All good - I would have won comfortably if last week players were named so I don't appreciate the comments regarding 'bad form'...

In future, could we please ensure all rules are both clearly stipulated and voted upon before each season (rather than ad hoc unilateral changes) because I never remember voting on banning captain loopholes (if anything, it's a display of skill from a coach)...

"There is to be NO DELIBERATE NAMING OF PLAYERS NOT PLAYING TO ABUSE CAPTAINCY OR EMERGENCY EFFECTS FOR PARTIAL LOCKOUTS."

Pretty sure Jukes has had this included in nearly every weekly post for a couple of years. More of a gentleman's agreement.

Jukes

Ladder!
New Brooklyn Hawks   9-3   1430   1380   103.62
Wisconsin Cockerels   8-4   1465   1383   105.93
Boston Terriers   8-4   1453   1400   103.78
Anaheim Mighty Ducks   8-4   1376   1340   102.69
Las Vegas Sinners   8-4   1382   1351   102.29
Chicago Sharks   7-5   1409   1372   102.70
---------------------------------------------------------------
Carolina Panthers   6-6   1430   1386   103.17
Ottawa Otters   6-6   1368   1363   100.37
Quito Quetzals   5-7   1407   1388   101.37
San Francisco Grizzlies   4-8   1338   1385   96.61
Houston Bombers   3-9   1329   1368   97.15
Colorado Avalanche   0-12   1169   1444   80.96

powersuperkents

I'm aware it's been there - I don't have time to challenge these things in detail so I haven't bothered until now. All I want to know is why an abitrary rule change has occurred... The practice has always been any proposed rule change is subject to a vote.