Wallo's Legends

[walloo44]

First attempt in a long time for me. not 100% on rookies but feel my team is solid, maybe lacking a POD?
thoughts and feedback appreciated

DEF: laird, hibberd, loyd, shaw, doedee, finlayson (cumming, mirra)

MID: Kelyy, Fyfe, Bontempelli, Beams, Cripps, Coniglio, Kelly, Barry (Baily, garlett, holman)

RUC: Grundy, Gawn (olango)

FWD: Heeney, Billings, Walters, Sicily, Ahern, Fritsch (switkowski, Ballard)

[Bully]

You might want to post your team first!  :P

[walloo44]

You might want to post your team first!  :P

:P updated

[Bully]

Looks fine but the big problem I see is you don't have one of the big 3, for the sake of the C you should get Danger/Mitchell/Martin.

I would cut one of Lloyd/Shaw and upgrade Cripps to Danger. Could then pick another rookie such as Naughton.

[Money Shot]

Looks fine but the big problem I see is you don't have one of the big 3, for the sake of the C you should get Danger/Mitchell/Martin.

I would cut one of Lloyd/Shaw and upgrade Cripps to Danger. Could then pick another rookie such as Naughton.

sound advice.

[walloo44]

Update 1.01

DEF: Hurley, Laird, Hibberd, Lloyd, doedee, finlayson, (Keeffe, mirra)

MID: mitchell, kelly, fyfe, beams, cripps, coniglio, kelly, barry (banfield, worpel, holman)

RUC: Grundy, Gawn (olango)

FWD: (Heeney, Billings, Smith, Christensen, Ahern, Fritsch, (rioli, garlett)

[Money Shot]

Really can't fault the team, good depth across all lines and you have a couple of nice pods in there as well.

[Jalapeno]

Really can't fault the team, good depth across all lines and you have a couple of nice pods in there as well.

I agree, very well balanced team. I myself would pick 1 of Cripp/Conigs and Downgrade the other to JOM/Armitage/Griffen and then upgrade 1 forward rookie. But that's just personal preference.

Overall though it is one of the best teams I have seen so far  ;D

[Bully]

Good team, can sit pretty and wait for the rookies.

[Ringo]

Well balanced team and one to sit and wait for rookies

[walloo44]

Update post JLT:
thoughts on this versus original?

DEF: laird, hibberd, loyd, Murray, doedee, finlayson (payne, murphy)

MID: Mitchel, Kelly, Fyfe, Beams, Cripps, Coniglio, o'meara, kelly (Banfield, worpel, holman)

RUC: Goldstein, Gawn (olango)

FWD: Heeney, Billings, smith, lobb, christensen, Fritsch (garlett, Ryan)

[piesfan1989]

I'm keen on lobb, but what's his fitness like?

[walloo44]

DEF: Laird, Hibberd, Savage, naughton, murray, finlayson (Doedee, Keeffe)

MID: Titch, Kelly, Fyfe, Bont, Cripps, Cognilio, Armitige, Kelly (Banfield, Barry, Holman)

RUC: gawn, Nankervis (olango)

FWD: Billings, walters, Smith, Sicily, Bundy, Fritsch, (giles-langdon, Ryan)

Finally feel happy with this team. Seems balanced to me on all lines. Ideally id love to have goldy over nank, but i dont think nank will go wrong all year as the sole ruckman.

Feedback much appreciated

[Samm79]

As you mentioned Nank is your weakness. You'll need him to improve by 10% as if he did what he did last year an 89 average ain't going to cut it. Other than that it looks nicely balanced.

[SilverLion]

If you're willing to go Nank, would look at NicNat since he's likely to play round 1. Worth the gamble over Nank imo.

Good luck for 2018