Two sides with a ruck dilemna

[jmoynihan9]

Hey guys. So all pre season I've had nic nat at R2, freeing me up some cash elsewhere. However yesterday I got cold feat and basically downgraded some expensive rookies too 170k ones and upgraded to Sauce Jacobs. Basically, I was looking for everyone's opinion on what side the thought was better. Cheers!

Team 1:
Laird, Yeo, Lloyd, Coffield, Doedee, Murray (Finlayson, J.Smith)
T.Mitchell, Merrett, Rockliff, Beams, Coniglio, O'Meara, Brayshaw, Banfield (Barry, Holman)
Jacobs, Gawn (Flynn, Cameron)
Billings, Heeney, Smith, Fogarty, Ryan, Fritsch (Venables, Giles-Langdon)
2k

Team 2:
Laird, Yeo, Lloyd, Coffield, Doedee, Murray (Finlayson, A.Pearce)
T.Mitchell, Merrett, Rockliff, Beams, Coniglio, O'Meara, Brayshaw, T. Kelly (Banfield, Holman)
Gawn, Nic Nat (English, Cameron)
Billings, Heeney, Smith, Christensen, Rayner, Fritsch (Ryan, Giles-Langdon)
4k

At the moment I'm sitting at team 1 with the set and forget rucks, but my gut feel is leaning toward team 2 in regards to job security and scoring potential of rookies as well as the mid pricer in Christensen. What does everyone reckon!

[Peter]

Would have gone team 2, even with advantage of hindsight