Round 16 Captain poll

[quinny88]

I've got Pendles into Danger but thinking it might be worth going Danger into Neale.

Pendles not as safe as he once was and even if he scores a 130 it would be awkward to take with Danger in the form he is

[GCSkiwi]

So. Take Titch or back Danger? Titch should end up with ~130, hard to turn down...

[Bones Bombers]

So. Take Titch or back Danger? Titch should end up with ~130, hard to turn down...

I have the same decision. Danger has score 141+ the last 6 games. Anybody else it would be a definite VC keeper.

[Money Shot]

So. Take Titch or back Danger? Titch should end up with ~130, hard to turn down...

I have the same decision. Danger has score 141+ the last 6 games. Anybody else it would be a definite VC keeper.

I'm seriously thinking of going with Danger even though 130 is a great score.

[Bones Bombers]

So. Take Titch or back Danger? Titch should end up with ~130, hard to turn down...

I have the same decision. Danger has score 141+ the last 6 games. Anybody else it would be a definite VC keeper.

I'm seriously thinking of going with Danger even though 130 is a great score.

I'm leaning that way too.

[SilverLion]

This is the problem people face by not making Danger VC :-\

[shaker]

How many monster scores can Danger have till a quiet one ? he has to be VC till it happens  ;D

[Samsturmfels]

So. Take Titch or back Danger? Titch should end up with ~130, hard to turn down...

I have the same decision. Danger has score 141+ the last 6 games. Anybody else it would be a definite VC keeper.

I'm seriously thinking of going with Danger even though 130 is a great score.

I have the same issue, its a difficult decision

[Jimmykidd]

really torn on this one. everything is telling me to take the 130 but danger is so good lately. against brisbane you'd think he will go pretty big or at least get 120-130.

[RaisyDaisy]

This is why you put the VC on Danger

If you don't have a single non playing player on Sunday than fair enough, but most should have one of Strnadica, Eddy, Marchbank, McInnes etc

If not, I'd back in Danger. 130 not enough based off his current form and opponent

[fanTCfool]

130 straight to the bank, cheers Titch  :-*

[GCSkiwi]

This is why you put the VC on Danger

If you don't have a single non playing player on Sunday than fair enough, but most should have one of Strnadica, Eddy, Marchbank, McInnes etc

If not, I'd back in Danger. 130 not enough based off his current form and opponent

Yeah. I backed him and it's looking good. My issue with Danger VC is having someone safe to C after him if he fails. Danger is the safe man, so the question is at what point you take your VC over Danger... at the moment, never!

[GoLions]

ZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Bones Bombers]

Well that worked out well 8)
But I have Zorko too who would have been even better!

[_wato]

ZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO