Help ... Who to get in my mids!!!

Started by arbel, June 23, 2017, 04:55:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

arbel

Need help i'm looking to bring in my final mid premo, who should I get out of:

Kennedy/jelwood/bonts/neale/treloar

Thanks

tommy10

IMO I would do: Jelwood>Neale>Bont>JPK>Treloar

tor01doc

Neale - cheaper than the best ones and averaging the most

Bont is off the boil

Treloar - OK

Selwood good but Neale better value

JPK just OK

So Neale > Selwood > Bont / Treloar / JPK

Bluesalltheway

I'd go Neale as well unless you don't mind spending the extra 30k on Selwood. Then it's a toss-up... both should finish the year in a similar fashion

tor01doc

96 views for 3 replies

Interesting

Used to be a more generous site in the good old days

Ringo

In this order Neale, Selwood, Bont, JPK, Treloar.

tor01doc

Quote from: Ringo on June 23, 2017, 06:48:53 PM
In this order Neale, Selwood, Bont, JPK, Treloar.

Knew it'd stir up some of the old timers

Agree Rrrringo

arbel

Thanks for the info guys!
I was originally thinking JPK only cos he is so cheap and out of neale/jpk/selwood think Sydney have the easier run home.

Tough choice

North Melbournes Finest

#8
Go Neale, super consistent and gets plenty of junk pill, works hard all day and usually avoids the tag. If he doesn't tickle your fancy go with Selwood as the clear 2nd option. I have Treloar and he's been great lately, but I have the other two ahead.


ivolve

Neale > Jelwood > Treloar > Bont > JPK IMHO

Good Luck.

bkp130

Im a bit different but I think JPK will come home like a freight train and sydney playing well at the moment

for me

JPK-Treloar-Neale-Bont-Jelwood

Good Luck. Cant really go wrong with any of them all amazing players

GoLions

JPK already gone but anyway

Jelwood > Neale > JPK > Bont > Treloar imo

SilverLion

Neale --> Treloar --> JPK --> Selwood --> Bont

batt

Quote from: tor01doc on June 23, 2017, 06:44:46 PM
96 views for 3 replies

Interesting

Used to be a more generous site in the good old days
Low effort post + no poll = little response.

Jesty