Bench / loophole Saad, McIntosh or Oxley?

Started by Johnahawk, April 24, 2015, 05:42:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Johnahawk


H1bb3i2d

It's basically neck and neck, so because of that, I'm playing it safely and McIntosh (E), play Oxley and wait on Saad as my final playing defender to go onto my bench for Goodes to take Tosh's score.

Wouldn't be happy if I benched Oxley for Tosh's score and Saad was a late out for example, with 2 donuts and only 1 emg!

no eye deer

Quote from: H1bb3i2d on April 24, 2015, 05:47:28 PM
It's basically neck and neck, so because of that, I'm playing it safely and McIntosh (E), play Oxley and wait on Saad as my final playing defender to go onto my bench for Goodes to take Tosh's score.

Wouldn't be happy if I benched Oxley for Tosh's score and Saad was a late out for example, with 2 donuts and only 1 emg!
The much forgotton loophole killer!

kfewster

Hoping McIntosh gets a wriggle on as I have him on field.

I'll take 70....come on son  ;D

Huttabito

Put McIntosh on bench with the (E), will loophole with Saad if no sufficient.

H1bb3i2d

Quote from: no eye deer on April 24, 2015, 08:24:56 PM
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on April 24, 2015, 05:47:28 PM
It's basically neck and neck, so because of that, I'm playing it safely and McIntosh (E), play Oxley and wait on Saad as my final playing defender to go onto my bench for Goodes to take Tosh's score.

Wouldn't be happy if I benched Oxley for Tosh's score and Saad was a late out for example, with 2 donuts and only 1 emg!
The much forgotton loophole killer!

Happened to me late last year with Burgoyne (might have been a late out or something?) Sadly, it was indeed avoidable, I just missed it :(

Happy I now have McIntosh sitting safely on my bench and don't need to tinker.

tommy10

Goodes to Oxley confirmed now. Mcintosh was my emg.