Ablett & Goodes for who?

[lukebomber]

Anyone concerned about Goodes copping the vest again and losing value?

Not ideal but I think Webb will cop the vest.

Am i reading into the team sheet too much that webb is named on the field though?

[Bully]

Anyone concerned about Goodes copping the vest again and losing value?

Not ideal but I think Webb will cop the vest.

Am i reading into the team sheet too much that webb is named on the field though?

Team sheet doesn't mean much, Goodes was useless as a sub last week and it would seem reasonable to make the debutant sub.

[H1bb3i2d]

Anyone concerned about Goodes copping the vest again and losing value?

Not ideal but I think Webb will cop the vest.

Am i reading into the team sheet too much that webb is named on the field though?

I'd rather Goodes not play than be sub :(

[Goosey]

Anyone concerned about Goodes copping the vest again and losing value?

Not ideal but I think Webb will cop the vest.

Am i reading into the team sheet too much that webb is named on the field though?

I'd rather Goodes not play than be sub :(

+1

I needed him for loophole purposes, now I have to choose between Oxley and Saad, going to play Oxley.

[lukebomber]

Now that goodes is sub again do we cut our losses and go to whitecross?

[Bully]

Now that goodes is sub again do we cut our losses and go to whitecross?

if Goodes scores 20 he loses 20k, I would hold off just to make sure