Is Swan a must?

[DaveElNacho]

I have Martin, Bennel, Bont and Adams atm, no swan

[Mark]

can we add a poll ?

maybe swan v bont etc

[SydneyRox]

yup.

Well that settles it then. :D

i like to be concise and to the point

8)

[bottlemart]

I have Martin, Bennel, Bont and Adams atm, no swan

Yes you're right.  I shouldn't have picked Dusty, but was told here he was a must have.

[no eye deer]

By going Tarrant to Lonie and Brown to Oxley, I've managed to find the cash to upgrade Wells to Danger. I must say, it makes my mids look good!

[Fid]

By going Tarrant to Lonie and Brown to Oxley, I've managed to find the cash to upgrade Wells to Danger. I must say, it makes my mids look good!

Yes, I've done similar with Brown and Hogan to upgrade Swan to Goddard.  I think I just got a little caught up with JS on the bench.

[Southstorm]

I have Martin, Bennel, Bont and Adams atm, no swan

Yes you're right.  I shouldn't have picked Dusty, but was told here he was a must have.

It's not a big deal mate, dusty won't produce stinkers like that every week. Be glad it happened early and that he isn't a POD.

[tommy10]

Danger will avg 115 in my opinion so good pick.

[Jackross10]

I have Martin, Bennel, Bont and Adams atm, no swan

Yes you're right.  I shouldn't have picked Dusty, but was told here he was a must have.

It's not a big deal mate, dusty won't produce stinkers like that every week. Be glad it happened early and that he isn't a POD.

VC next week vs dogs. He will destroy

[ryanbob0357]

I just upgraded Swan to Gray after going Nicnat to Belly. Figured I'd rather pay more for a good scoring Swan, than trade him out for a loss with shower scores.

[no eye deer]

Figured I'd rather pay more for a good scoring Swan, than trade him out for a loss with shower scores.

Yeah, that's my way of thinking as well. Danger seems less of a chance of letting me down than Swan.

[Mark]

Figured I'd rather pay more for a good scoring Swan, than trade him out for a loss with shower scores.

Yeah, that's my way of thinking as well. Danger seems less of a chance of letting me down than Swan.

agree...and could trade before Rd 3 IF swan comes out and scores 110+ in the first 2 games..

Im doing the opposite starting Ablett, if he stinks it he is gone before Rd 3 then ill get him back when he bottoms out..

[HotTiges]

a must? Dont think he is..im questioning if he can avg 95+..

[Torpedo10]

For the first year ever I'm starting Ablett, Pendles AND Swanny.