Hogan v Clark

Started by Money Shot, February 28, 2015, 06:53:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

meow meow

Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2015, 08:40:20 PM
Hogan it is 8)
Clark just seems to injury prone for me ...
(Tbh don't know if he is or not just seems to always have a minor injury)

Why didn't Hogan play at all last year?

Money Shot

Quote from: meow meow on February 28, 2015, 09:07:59 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2015, 08:40:20 PM
Hogan it is 8)
Clark just seems to injury prone for me ...
(Tbh don't know if he is or not just seems to always have a minor injury)

Why didn't Hogan play at all last year?
Fair point.

Holz

Quote from: meow meow on February 28, 2015, 09:07:59 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2015, 08:40:20 PM
Hogan it is 8)
Clark just seems to injury prone for me ...
(Tbh don't know if he is or not just seems to always have a minor injury)

Why didn't Hogan play at all last year?

One injury v about 20.

quinny88

Calling it now. Hogan will average in the 50s or 60s.

kilbluff1985


Big Mac

Quote from: quinny88 on March 01, 2015, 10:11:31 PM
Calling it now. Hogan will average in the 50s or 60s.

I thought this was a given? I'd be more than happy with a 60 average from him. Good luck finding 4 better scoring rookies with the same JS (Assuming you start fielding rooks at F5)

quinny88

Quote from: Big  Mac on March 01, 2015, 10:27:58 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on March 01, 2015, 10:11:31 PM
Calling it now. Hogan will average in the 50s or 60s.

I thought this was a given? I'd be more than happy with a 60 average from him. Good luck finding 4 better scoring rookies with the same JS (Assuming you start fielding rooks at F5)

My point is that he's not the biggest lock like some are suggesting.
I would expect more out of Clark and Karnezis

H1bb3i2d

Quote from: quinny88 on March 01, 2015, 11:21:26 PM
Quote from: Big  Mac on March 01, 2015, 10:27:58 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on March 01, 2015, 10:11:31 PM
Calling it now. Hogan will average in the 50s or 60s.

I thought this was a given? I'd be more than happy with a 60 average from him. Good luck finding 4 better scoring rookies with the same JS (Assuming you start fielding rooks at F5)

My point is that he's not the biggest lock like some are suggesting.
I would expect more out of Clark and Karnezis

But they both have to get games, first. Hogan has the best JS of all <200k picks, anywhere.

Gigantor


coombe95

could be way off, but isnt hogan playing Full forward?
FF = Not SC worthy
especially given the fwd/mid rookies out there?

GCSkiwi

Quote from: coombe95 on March 02, 2015, 11:37:03 PM
could be way off, but isnt hogan playing Full forward?
FF = Not SC worthy
especially given the fwd/mid rookies out there?

I think the point is more job security, realistically the likes of Tyson, Polec, Miles last year are rare and if you can get someone playing every week scoring 60s mostly and the occasional 70+ I'm fine with that for 130k... Not too sure who you're thinking of in terms of others that could massively out do that - bear in mind getting a regular gig is half the battle, if you're scoring 80-90 but only playing a few games you're not that much good for SC. Think guys like Lennon last year, when he got full games he scored fine for a rookie, but he just didn't cement a spot in the main side, 5/7 of his games he was the sub...

hawkboy80

Quote from: Holz on March 01, 2015, 02:17:08 PM
Quote from: meow meow on February 28, 2015, 09:07:59 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2015, 08:40:20 PM
Hogan it is 8)
Clark just seems to injury prone for me ...
(Tbh don't know if he is or not just seems to always have a minor injury)

Why didn't Hogan play at all last year?

One injury v about 20.
another fair point  ;)