Mid upgrade?

Started by powersuperkents, June 30, 2014, 02:18:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

powersuperkents

Current Midfield: (subbing Pav with Dusty dpp)
Rocky, Gaj, Pendles, Beams, Barlow, Cotchin, Miles, Dusty, Shenton, C. Beams

Cheers everyone  :)

Priddis is another I'm strongly considering. So far I'm thinking, this week: Pav-> Heppell & Ambrose-> Kersten/Honeychurch; next week: C.Beams/Shenton-> Stevie J/Priddis & possibly another downgrade

dirkdiggler

Quote from: powersuperkents on June 30, 2014, 02:18:33 PM
Current Midfield: (subbing Pav with Dusty dpp)
Rocky, Gaj, Pendles, Beams, Barlow, Cotchin, Miles, Dusty, Shenton, C. Beams

Cheers everyone  :)

Priddis is another I'm strongly considering. So far I'm thinking, this week: Pav-> Heppell & Ambrose-> Kersten/Honeychurch; next week: C.Beams/Shenton-> Stevie J/Priddis & possibly another downgrade

yeah I reckon you need something a bit unique in there.....maybe Prestia or Thompson

powersuperkents

#2
Worked out an array of equations to decide and found:

As at: 30/06/2014

Averages (no problem finding  ;) ):
JPK: 111.5
Hep D: 110.9
Stevie J: 109.1 (85 ave since poor form)
Priddis: 107
Treloar: 106.6
Prestia: 105.9
Libby: 102.7

Range (consistency; note: some players suffered one off poor performances, or inflated scores from a single performance):
JPK: 56
Prestia: 59 (low of 80, surprisingly consistent)
Priddis: 76
Libby: 89
Treloar: 90
Hep D: 109 (one off score of 43)
Stevie J: 112

Medians:
Hep D: 111
Libby: 110.5
JPK: 110
Treloar: 109.5
Priddis: 106
Stevie J: 105
Prestia: 103 (low ceiling)

If I assigned points regarding ranks (ranging from 6-0):
1st: Jpk - 16pts, now I see why the price tag is so high, didn't rate him but he seems the cream of the crop
2nd: Hep D - 12pts
3rd: Priddis - 9 pts
4th: Libby - 8 pts, however average is last
5th: Treloar - 7 pts
6th: Prestia - 6 pts
7th: Stevie J - 5pts

In summary, I'm going to lock in Heppell & aim for JPK next week, if financially short I'll go for Priddis. Can't read too much into this because the range equates for 33% of the total score, this factor faces a lot of variables, however, for the purposes of concluding I just went Highest round score - Lowest round score.  :)