Knights+30k OR Boyd?

Ziebelling · March 10, 2009, 06:03:09 AM

Im having trouble deciding between these two. Knights has shown us what he can do and has the potential to avg. 90-100. But I just cant trust him for some reason even though he has had a good pre-season.

And then theres Boyd who flys under everyones radar and had a fantastic 08. I'm leaning towards Boydy atm since he never gets tagged cause he is the tagger, similar to Kornes.

What do you guys think?

BU1101 · March 10, 2009, 06:12:54 AM

Knights was awesome for me in 07 and IMO boyd is inconsistent for someone of that cost and isn't likely to improve where as knights could comfortably improve on last years scores if the preseason form is an indictation.

snubbs · March 10, 2009, 07:52:15 AM

yeh, like BU1101 said, Knights had great numbers in 07. He should average big numbers this year. And youll have the 30k aswell

love4thegame · March 11, 2009, 12:35:40 AM

knights

Hawks_1976 · March 12, 2009, 01:13:49 AM

Knights looks capable of averaging 90 this year.
The extra 30k could be valuable.

snozza · March 12, 2009, 05:15:18 AM

Both will give you a similar points average however Knights potential to improve is far better than Boyds. Get Knights and keep your 30K.

Ziebelling · March 14, 2009, 11:06:30 AM

thanks for the comments.

But I think I'll stick with Boyd for now. :D