opinions needed, can you help??

Started by hespey, March 13, 2010, 12:57:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

care to rate?

4/10 or below
0 (0%)
5/10
0 (0%)
6/10
1 (12.5%)
7/10
3 (37.5%)
8/10
2 (25%)
9/10
1 (12.5%)
10/10
1 (12.5%)

Total Members Voted: 3

hespey

just picked my (?) final team, depending on how much it gets ravaged by the fanfooty folk. any opinions?  :-\

BACKS
1. ENRIGHT, Corey
2. HODGE, Luke
3. GILBEE, Lindsay
4. MACDONALD, Joel
5. MALCESKI, Nick
6. HUNT, Josh
7. WATERS, Beau
Maguire (BRL)
Silvagni (FRE)

MIDS
(GEE) 8. ABLETT, Gary  :-*
(HAW) 9. MITCHELL, Sam
(ESS) 10. MCVEIGH, Mark
(CAR) 11. WALKER, Andrew
(RIC) 12. MARTIN, Dustin
(FRE) 13. BARLOW, Michael
Banner (PTA)
Shuey (WCE)

RUCK
14. SANDILANDS, Aaron
15. TIPPETT, Kurt
Warnock (CAR)
Skipper (HAW)

FORWARD
16. RIEWOLDT, Nick
17. O'KEEFE, Ryan
18. PAVLICH, Matthew
19. HIGGINS, Shaun
20. FRANKLIN, Lance
21. HALL, Barry
22. MEDHURST, Paul
Rockliff (BRL)
Hitchcock (PTA)

hespey

who rated a 10/10 and a 6/10? care to elaborate?

MC

Your mids seem a bit light on, but that's fairly common this year... Overall a solid team, i like the choices of McDonald and Medhurst, though perhaps for the same price Ziebell or Dangerfield may have more upside? Saying that i think Medhurst is due for a good season, though i don't expect him to reach the same heights as his AA (2008) year when he averaged 88... Still, it's a bold move which could prove to be a good one!
9/10

c4v3m4n

Everything is strong except for your midfield, where all the major point scorers are! IMO, downgrade Tippett (too inconsistent) and downgrade a forward line player in order to strengthen that midfield.

Still, its not a bad team though. 8/10

hespey

took on some advice. thanks guys.

update:

BACKS
enright
hodge
gilbee
macdonald
malceski
hunt
waters

maguire
silvagni

MIDS
ablett
mitchell
ball
martin
barlow
banner

shuey
bastinac

RUCKS
sandilands
tippitt

warnock
skipper

FORWARDS
riewoldt
okeefe
pavlich
higgins
franklin
hall
ziebell

rockliff
hitchcock


on a mission for 10/10

Didds70

G'day Hespey , yep pretty resonable overall , gave a 7/10 . My only real query is the 5 rookies in the mid . 5 out of 8 seems to place a fair load on the top 3 mids , if you've still got a bit cash remaining , why not look for a more experienced mid priced 4th mid . Just think starting Rd1 with 3 rookies on the ground might be pushing it a bit , risky to try to get away with it week in week out . But anyway , thats just 1 opinion . Good Luck .

lowedown11

i also hav 3 rokkie mids starting but they are better...must hav trengrove martin atleast then 1 of skully or barlow starting instaed of banner.....