Langford or Cunningham?

[Bennny]

Who should i bring in this week via Langdon to the midfield if needed?Langford BE -52, Cunningham BE -66 (i think these be's are right) I think Langford might have slightly better JS though.. Cheers :)

[Ricochet]

Swans like Cunningham because they lack speed through the midfield. Langford looks settled in that 22 but Hawks have Sewell to come back in so not sure how he will affect Langford. Who are your other midfield rookies?

[Bennny]

My backline/midfield stands:
McVeigh, Mitchell, Simpson, B.Smith, Suckling McDonald (Langdon, Georgiou)
Ablett, Pendlebury, Rockliff, Beams, Shuey, Tyson, Polec, Ellis (Dunstan, WANGANEEN)

[E-Lemon_ator]

Go Cunningham, his speed is why the Swans will keep playing him

[Ricochet]

Yeh go Cunningham mate

[Bennny]

Getting Langford would open up DPP also.. I'm still 50/50

[Bennny]

Yeah Cunningham it is. Thanks guys