ADCOCK V BIRCHALL V SUCKLING

[Onlygot1shot]

HELP STUCK BETWEEN THESE 3!

[GoLions]

What would you do with the extra cash if you chose Suckling? If it can improve your team by a fair bit elsewhere then get him.
I've had both Adcock and Birchall in and out of my team a few times, if byes are a problem then Adcock may be a better choice, think he can average around 90-95 this year and won't have to worry about getting tagged.

Also, is this for D4? Cause I wouldn't want Suckers at D3 if that's the case

[Sabretooth Tigers]

 :)
Depends on how you are approaching your trading. How many keepers are you fielding in round 1  ?   Suckling is not one , IMO Birchall is and Adcock is a possible if everything goes right for him. For me I'd go Birchall anyway. Cheers mate.    ;)

[Jmachete]

Langford

[smashbox]

Birchall proven premium for a long time. Always finishes with a 90+ ave which is great for a DEF. Has a higher ceiling than the others and is proven, no brainer for me

[AaronKirk]

Have to go Birchall. Higher ceiling and proven ability to get massive scores. Adcock will be consistent around 90-95. Risk with Suckling coming back from his knee injury but his cheap price makes him appealing but not in my side.

[Mat0369]

Birch unless you also have Mitchell, then I would go with Suckling as you can use him as a mid price cash cow to turn into a premo defender

[HotTiges]

Suckers should make 100k at least and by then a possible premo would of dropped enough